Epifaunal communities differ between tropical and polar mesophotic marine animal forests

Understanding marine biodiversity in polar regions remains limited compared to tropical ecosystems, where coastal habitats have been more extensively studied; however, both regions exhibit a substantial lack of knowledge regarding mesophotic marine biota. Marine Animal Forests (MAFs), key components of oceanic biodiversity, remain largely unexplored at mesophotic depths (30–200 m) due to accessibility constraints. Here, we examined epifaunal assemblages associated with mesophotic MAFs in polar (Arctic) and tropical (Caribbean) regions, analysing taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity, along with body size as a key functional trait. Community structure differed notably between regions: amphipods dominated in the Arctic, while decapods were more abundant in the Caribbean. Individuals from both groups were significantly larger in the Arctic, with decapods reaching up to four times and amphipods up to two times the body size of their tropical counterparts, supporting the biogeographic pattern described by the Bergmann’s rule. Overall, our results provided a comparative analysis of epifaunal communities associated with mesophotic MAFs in two biogeographically contrasting regions and established an initial framework for understanding latitudinal trends in epifaunal diversity within mesophotic ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-70534-1
Primary Topic
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Epifaunal communities differ between tropical and polar mesophotic marine animal forests

Lorenzo Bramanti, G. Bardout, Sandra Navarro‐Mayoral, Fernando Tuya et al.
Scientific Reports
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
article

Epifaunal communities differ between tropical and polar mesophotic marine animal forests

Lorenzo Bramanti, G. Bardout, Sandra Navarro‐Mayoral, Fernando Tuya, M. Boulais, N. Mollon, E. Périé-Bardout, Sonia Díaz-Vergara, Francisco Otero-Ferrer, Naia Larrinoa, M. Mellet, F. Gazzola, E. Marivindt, J. Casset, E. Gouin
article en

Abstract

Understanding marine biodiversity in polar regions remains limited compared to tropical ecosystems, where coastal habitats have been more extensively studied; however, both regions exhibit a substantial lack of knowledge regarding mesophotic marine biota. Marine Animal Forests (MAFs), key components of oceanic biodiversity, remain largely unexplored at mesophotic depths (30–200 m) due to accessibility constraints. Here, we examined epifaunal assemblages associated with mesophotic MAFs in polar (Arctic) and tropical (Caribbean) regions, analysing taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity, along with body size as a key functional trait. Community structure differed notably between regions: amphipods dominated in the Arctic, while decapods were more abundant in the Caribbean. Individuals from both groups were significantly larger in the Arctic, with decapods reaching up to four times and amphipods up to two times the body size of their tropical counterparts, supporting the biogeographic pattern described by the Bergmann’s rule. Overall, our results provided a comparative analysis of epifaunal communities associated with mesophotic MAFs in two biogeographically contrasting regions and established an initial framework for understanding latitudinal trends in epifaunal diversity within mesophotic ecosystems.

Scientific Reports
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Concord Consortium (US), Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (FR), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR), Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls-sur-Mer (FR), Laboratoire d'Ecogéochimie des Environnements Benthiques (FR), Structure et Instabilité des Génomes (FR)
BNP Paribas Cardif, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.