Refocusing the Surgical Lens for Ear Reconstruction: Understanding Lay Perception of Ear Asymmetry

Objective Ear reconstruction principles center on restoring a natural-appearing ear that does not draw visual attention. However, limited objective evidence exists defining which auricular differences are most perceptible. This study evaluated layperson perception of ear asymmetries to identify characteristics that influence visual attention. Design Experimental survey study using digitally manipulated standardized facial photographs. Setting Online crowdsourcing platform. Participants Six standardized facial identities were digitally modified. A total of 550 adult participants evaluated 50 randomized stimuli. Interventions Baseline ears were digitally symmetrized, followed by unilateral modifications across graded magnitude levels of 4 auricular characteristics: contour/definition, projection, size, and vertical position, generating 138 experimental stimuli. Main Outcome Measure(s) Proportion of responses identifying the ears as an attention-drawing feature, and predictors of ear selection as attention-drawing evaluated with generalized linear mixed-effects models. Results Across experimental stimuli, ears were selected as attention-drawing in 3.8% of responses. The highest rates of ear selection occurred with +10% vertical displacement (32.1%), +15% size increase (22.9%), and −10% vertical displacement (21.5%). In mixed-effects models, increasing vertical position magnitude was significantly associated with higher odds of ear selection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.041, P = .004), followed by size magnitude (OR: 1.017, P = .018). Projection ( P = .91) and contour/definition ( P = .168) were not significant predictors of ear selection. Conclusion Ear asymmetries were infrequently identified as attention-drawing during frontal face viewing, even at larger magnitudes of deviation. Vertical position and size were the most salient. These results may inform reconstructive planning, counseling, and expectation-setting regarding how postoperative ear asymmetries are perceived.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261481313
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Refocusing the Surgical Lens for Ear Reconstruction: Understanding Lay Perception of Ear Asymmetry

Mariola Paruzel‐Czachura, Cassandra Ligh, Scott P. Bartlett, Miriam Meghnagi et al.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
article

Refocusing the Surgical Lens for Ear Reconstruction: Understanding Lay Perception of Ear Asymmetry

Mariola Paruzel‐Czachura, Cassandra Ligh, Scott P. Bartlett, Miriam Meghnagi, Anjan Chatterjee, Elizabeth Ward
article en

Abstract

Objective Ear reconstruction principles center on restoring a natural-appearing ear that does not draw visual attention. However, limited objective evidence exists defining which auricular differences are most perceptible. This study evaluated layperson perception of ear asymmetries to identify characteristics that influence visual attention. Design Experimental survey study using digitally manipulated standardized facial photographs. Setting Online crowdsourcing platform. Participants Six standardized facial identities were digitally modified. A total of 550 adult participants evaluated 50 randomized stimuli. Interventions Baseline ears were digitally symmetrized, followed by unilateral modifications across graded magnitude levels of 4 auricular characteristics: contour/definition, projection, size, and vertical position, generating 138 experimental stimuli. Main Outcome Measure(s) Proportion of responses identifying the ears as an attention-drawing feature, and predictors of ear selection as attention-drawing evaluated with generalized linear mixed-effects models. Results Across experimental stimuli, ears were selected as attention-drawing in 3.8% of responses. The highest rates of ear selection occurred with +10% vertical displacement (32.1%), +15% size increase (22.9%), and −10% vertical displacement (21.5%). In mixed-effects models, increasing vertical position magnitude was significantly associated with higher odds of ear selection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.041, P = .004), followed by size magnitude (OR: 1.017, P = .018). Projection ( P = .91) and contour/definition ( P = .168) were not significant predictors of ear selection. Conclusion Ear asymmetries were infrequently identified as attention-drawing during frontal face viewing, even at larger magnitudes of deviation. Vertical position and size were the most salient. These results may inform reconstructive planning, counseling, and expectation-setting regarding how postoperative ear asymmetries are perceived.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.