Complications and Safety Profile of XEN ® Gel Stent in Glaucoma: A Five-Year MAUDE Database Analysis

Purpose To analyze adverse events associated with the XEN® Gel Stent using the FDA’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.Methods The FDA MAUDE database was queried for reports from January 1, 2020, to November 8, 2024, using the product code “KYF.” Reports unrelated to the XEN® Gel Stent were excluded. Data were analyzed for patient demographics, event types, and device-related complications. Descriptive statistics were used to outline the trends in device-related and patient-related issues.Results A total of 1,816 reports were identified. After excluding 688 reports unrelated to the XEN® Gel Stent, 338 reports that originated from the literature rather than primary MAUDE submissions, and 2 reports with insufficient information, 788 reports were included for analysis. The most frequently reported device-related issues included Difficult to insert (device sticking) (n = 217, 36.7%), Obstruction of flow (n = 78, 13.2%), device malposition (68, 11.5%). Common patient-related complications included increased intraocular pressure (IOP) (142, 21.8%) and eye injury (137, 21.0%), followed by erosion (77, 11.8%).Conclusions Over five years, the MAUDE database has revealed that the most common issues with the XEN® Gel Stent involve device-related problems like resistance and blockage, as well as patient complications. While the data comes from voluntary reports and has its limitations, these real-world insights are valuable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Eye Research
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2026.2728913
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Complications and Safety Profile of XEN ® Gel Stent in Glaucoma: A Five-Year MAUDE Database Analysis

Alina Ghazou, Martin W. Gerges, Yousef Hawas, Ibraheem M. Alkhawaldeh et al.
Current Eye Research
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Complications and Safety Profile of XEN ® Gel Stent in Glaucoma: A Five-Year MAUDE Database Analysis

Alina Ghazou, Martin W. Gerges, Yousef Hawas, Ibraheem M. Alkhawaldeh, Asem Alqudah, Aya Awad, Mohamed Marouf
article en

Abstract

Purpose To analyze adverse events associated with the XEN® Gel Stent using the FDA’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.Methods The FDA MAUDE database was queried for reports from January 1, 2020, to November 8, 2024, using the product code “KYF.” Reports unrelated to the XEN® Gel Stent were excluded. Data were analyzed for patient demographics, event types, and device-related complications. Descriptive statistics were used to outline the trends in device-related and patient-related issues.Results A total of 1,816 reports were identified. After excluding 688 reports unrelated to the XEN® Gel Stent, 338 reports that originated from the literature rather than primary MAUDE submissions, and 2 reports with insufficient information, 788 reports were included for analysis. The most frequently reported device-related issues included Difficult to insert (device sticking) (n = 217, 36.7%), Obstruction of flow (n = 78, 13.2%), device malposition (68, 11.5%). Common patient-related complications included increased intraocular pressure (IOP) (142, 21.8%) and eye injury (137, 21.0%), followed by erosion (77, 11.8%).Conclusions Over five years, the MAUDE database has revealed that the most common issues with the XEN® Gel Stent involve device-related problems like resistance and blockage, as well as patient complications. While the data comes from voluntary reports and has its limitations, these real-world insights are valuable.

Current Eye Research
University of Jordan (JO), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Mansoura University (EG), Mutah University (JO), Tanta University (EG), Princess Royal Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.