Preservice science teachers’ systems thinking skills, conceptual understanding, and system-level misconceptions: the water cycle system*

This study explored the systems thinking skills (STS) and conceptual understanding of preservice science teachers (PSTs) related to the water cycle system. Research was designed as descriptive and correlational study with the use of two instruments -the Water Cycle Concept Map (WCCM) and the Water Cycle Diagnostic Test (WCDT). Data were collected from 254 PSTs from three universities. Concept map analysis revealed that most of the PSTs tended to rely on domino causality and encountered challenges in recognizing multiple causal patterns by using mutual and relational causalities. Cyclic causality was the second most commonly used pattern. WCDT scores showed that PSTs had both scientifically accepted conceptual understanding (seeing the oceans being the biggest moisture source, sun as the driving forces of the water cycle and human impact on the water cycle system) and system-level misconceptions (observed when they could not link physics, chemistry, biology and earth science knowledge correctly to explain the changes of water states in different processes (evaporation, condensation, cloud formation, and deposition). The relationships between STS and WCDT scores were found to be positive and of small to moderate strength, and pointed out that PSTs identified certain system relationships but their STS remained limited in terms of structural and procedural dimensions. This study suggested that teacher education programs should help PSTs to move beyond simply recognizing the components of the water cycle system and develop a deeper and more sophisticated understanding of the water cycle system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Education Research
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2026.2730583
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Preservice science teachers’ systems thinking skills, conceptual understanding, and system-level misconceptions: the water cycle system*

Gaye Teksöz, Özgül Yılmaz Tüzün, Beyza Mercan-Şahin
Environmental Education Research
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Preservice science teachers’ systems thinking skills, conceptual understanding, and system-level misconceptions: the water cycle system*

Gaye Teksöz, Özgül Yılmaz Tüzün, Beyza Mercan-Şahin
article en

Abstract

This study explored the systems thinking skills (STS) and conceptual understanding of preservice science teachers (PSTs) related to the water cycle system. Research was designed as descriptive and correlational study with the use of two instruments -the Water Cycle Concept Map (WCCM) and the Water Cycle Diagnostic Test (WCDT). Data were collected from 254 PSTs from three universities. Concept map analysis revealed that most of the PSTs tended to rely on domino causality and encountered challenges in recognizing multiple causal patterns by using mutual and relational causalities. Cyclic causality was the second most commonly used pattern. WCDT scores showed that PSTs had both scientifically accepted conceptual understanding (seeing the oceans being the biggest moisture source, sun as the driving forces of the water cycle and human impact on the water cycle system) and system-level misconceptions (observed when they could not link physics, chemistry, biology and earth science knowledge correctly to explain the changes of water states in different processes (evaporation, condensation, cloud formation, and deposition). The relationships between STS and WCDT scores were found to be positive and of small to moderate strength, and pointed out that PSTs identified certain system relationships but their STS remained limited in terms of structural and procedural dimensions. This study suggested that teacher education programs should help PSTs to move beyond simply recognizing the components of the water cycle system and develop a deeper and more sophisticated understanding of the water cycle system.

Environmental Education Research
Sakarya University (TR), Doğuş University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preservice science teachers’ systems thinking skills, conceptual understanding, and system-level misconceptions: the water cycle system* — Gaye Teksöz, Özgül Yılmaz Tüzün, et al. · Environmental Education Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS