Influence Functions for Data Attribution in System Identification and LQR Control

Abstract When a controller is designed from an identified model, its performance ultimately depends on the trajectories used for identification, yet pinpointing which ones help or hurt remains an open problem. We bring influence functions, a data-attribution tool from machine learning, into this setting by chaining two closed-form sensitivity analyses across a regularized least-squares identification and an infinite-horizon linear quadratic regulator (LQR) pipeline. On the identification side, the quadratic loss admits an exact leave-one-trajectory-out (LOTO) parameter shift; a reusable first-order approximation follows with a Neumann-series error bound. On the control side, we implicitly differentiate through the discrete algebraic Riccati equation (DARE) via its discrete Lyapunov structure and compress the cost gradient to a single adjoint Lyapunov solve. The resulting scores track true LOTO retraining with Pearson correlations above 0.99, at 7× to 60× the speed, on linear systems of dimension 2 to 10, while a nonlinear benchmark confines the method to nominal, surrogate-level attribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4072703
Primary Topic
Control Systems and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Influence Functions for Data Attribution in System Identification and LQR Control

Soovadeep Bakshi, Jiamin Xu, Dongmei Chen, Jiachen Li et al.
ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control
Control Systems and Identification
article

Influence Functions for Data Attribution in System Identification and LQR Control

Soovadeep Bakshi, Jiamin Xu, Dongmei Chen, Jiachen Li, Shihao Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract When a controller is designed from an identified model, its performance ultimately depends on the trajectories used for identification, yet pinpointing which ones help or hurt remains an open problem. We bring influence functions, a data-attribution tool from machine learning, into this setting by chaining two closed-form sensitivity analyses across a regularized least-squares identification and an infinite-horizon linear quadratic regulator (LQR) pipeline. On the identification side, the quadratic loss admits an exact leave-one-trajectory-out (LOTO) parameter shift; a reusable first-order approximation follows with a Neumann-series error bound. On the control side, we implicitly differentiate through the discrete algebraic Riccati equation (DARE) via its discrete Lyapunov structure and compress the cost gradient to a single adjoint Lyapunov solve. The resulting scores track true LOTO retraining with Pearson correlations above 0.99, at 7× to 60× the speed, on linear systems of dimension 2 to 10, while a nonlinear benchmark confines the method to nominal, surrogate-level attribution.

ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control
Systems & Processes Engineering Corporation (United States) (US), Cytoskeleton (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Control Systems and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.