Cross-Validation of Collocated ICESat-2 and CALIPSO Cloud-Aerosol Discrimination

This study presents a feature-scale cross-validation of the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) cloud–aerosol discrimination (CAD) products using 9289 globally collocated Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) observations acquired between October 2018 and June 2023. The operational ATL09 and a U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) product are evaluated against CALIPSO on a pixel-by-pixel basis using class-specific metrics. Agreement improves with decreasing along-track comparison-window width, which limits spatial divergence from the ground-track crossing, whereas agreement varies weakly and non-monotonically across the actual 0–10 min inter-satellite time separation. Agreement also depends strongly on the CALIPSO integration size used for layer detection, which affects both feature detectability and effective spatial resolution. Restricting the analysis to ±60° latitude markedly increases aerosol agreement, consistent with reduced influence from high-latitude ambiguities associated with blowing snow, diamond dust, and larger crossing angles, while cloud metrics change more modestly. At a 1-s comparison width and 5-km maximum CALIPSO integration scale, CNN–CALIPSO F1 exceeds ATL09–CALIPSO F1 by 0.027–0.045 globally, with all paired 95% confidence intervals above zero across cloud and aerosol classes under daytime and nighttime conditions; however, some differences within ±60° are not distinguishable from zero. These results show that agreement is governed not only by retrieval algorithms but also by differences in instrument characteristics, effective spatial resolution, and sampling strategy. The proposed collocation framework provides a basis for evaluating current and future machine-learning approaches for spaceborne lidar CAD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18183167
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cross-Validation of Collocated ICESat-2 and CALIPSO Cloud-Aerosol Discrimination

Patrick Selmer, Matthew J. McGill, Joseph Gomes, C. Fuller et al.
Remote Sensing
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
article

Cross-Validation of Collocated ICESat-2 and CALIPSO Cloud-Aerosol Discrimination

Patrick Selmer, Matthew J. McGill, Joseph Gomes, C. Fuller, Shi Kuang
article en

Abstract

This study presents a feature-scale cross-validation of the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) cloud–aerosol discrimination (CAD) products using 9289 globally collocated Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) observations acquired between October 2018 and June 2023. The operational ATL09 and a U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) product are evaluated against CALIPSO on a pixel-by-pixel basis using class-specific metrics. Agreement improves with decreasing along-track comparison-window width, which limits spatial divergence from the ground-track crossing, whereas agreement varies weakly and non-monotonically across the actual 0–10 min inter-satellite time separation. Agreement also depends strongly on the CALIPSO integration size used for layer detection, which affects both feature detectability and effective spatial resolution. Restricting the analysis to ±60° latitude markedly increases aerosol agreement, consistent with reduced influence from high-latitude ambiguities associated with blowing snow, diamond dust, and larger crossing angles, while cloud metrics change more modestly. At a 1-s comparison width and 5-km maximum CALIPSO integration scale, CNN–CALIPSO F1 exceeds ATL09–CALIPSO F1 by 0.027–0.045 globally, with all paired 95% confidence intervals above zero across cloud and aerosol classes under daytime and nighttime conditions; however, some differences within ±60° are not distinguishable from zero. These results show that agreement is governed not only by retrieval algorithms but also by differences in instrument characteristics, effective spatial resolution, and sampling strategy. The proposed collocation framework provides a basis for evaluating current and future machine-learning approaches for spaceborne lidar CAD.

Remote SensingVol. 18(18)
University of Iowa (US), Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.