Displacement Estimation of Structures With Flag‐Shaped Hysteresis Loops

ABSTRACT Time‐history analyses were conducted on single‐degree‐of‐freedom (SDOF) systems with flag‐shaped hysteresis loops using a far‐field ground motion suite to estimate peak displacements, Δ p , and equivalent deformation cycles, N c , associated with cumulative displacement demands. The varied parameters included loop dissipation parameters β (0.1 to 1), strength‐reduction factors R (2 to 8), positive post‐yield stiffness ratios r (0 to 0.9), structural periods T (0.2 s to 3.5 s), period‐to‐earthquake‐record‐duration ratios T / D (0.014 to 0.25), and viscous damping models. Empirical equations were proposed for the mean Δ p and N c . A comparison was made with responses of a three‐storey rocking structure with tension‐only friction dissipators (TOFDs). Using T / D instead of T improved displacement predictability for short‐period structures and gave similar accuracy for longer‐period structures. The greatest Δ p occurred in low‐dissipation structures with β = 0.1, r = 0.0, R = 8, and T / D = 0.014. Conventional displacement estimation methods may underpredict Δ p . The largest N c occurred for r = 0.9, β = 0.1, R = 8, and T / D = 0.014. Conservative equations were proposed for Δ p considering β , R , and T / D with r = 0.0, giving a coefficient of determination R 2 of 0.89. For N c , using r = 0.3 as a practical upper‐bound representative of common structures, conservative equations were proposed with R 2 of 0.91. The mean Δ p and cumulative TOFD displacement of the rocking structure subjected to the ground motion suite were similar to those from SDOF systems with matching β , R , r , and T . The empirical equations provided conservative predictions for the rocking‐structure responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.70294
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Displacement Estimation of Structures With Flag‐Shaped Hysteresis Loops

G. Charles Clifton, Geoffrey W. Rodgers, Masoumeh Farshbaf, Shahab Ramhormozian et al.
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Displacement Estimation of Structures With Flag‐Shaped Hysteresis Loops

G. Charles Clifton, Geoffrey W. Rodgers, Masoumeh Farshbaf, Shahab Ramhormozian, Gregory A. MacRae, Yudi Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Time‐history analyses were conducted on single‐degree‐of‐freedom (SDOF) systems with flag‐shaped hysteresis loops using a far‐field ground motion suite to estimate peak displacements, Δ p , and equivalent deformation cycles, N c , associated with cumulative displacement demands. The varied parameters included loop dissipation parameters β (0.1 to 1), strength‐reduction factors R (2 to 8), positive post‐yield stiffness ratios r (0 to 0.9), structural periods T (0.2 s to 3.5 s), period‐to‐earthquake‐record‐duration ratios T / D (0.014 to 0.25), and viscous damping models. Empirical equations were proposed for the mean Δ p and N c . A comparison was made with responses of a three‐storey rocking structure with tension‐only friction dissipators (TOFDs). Using T / D instead of T improved displacement predictability for short‐period structures and gave similar accuracy for longer‐period structures. The greatest Δ p occurred in low‐dissipation structures with β = 0.1, r = 0.0, R = 8, and T / D = 0.014. Conventional displacement estimation methods may underpredict Δ p . The largest N c occurred for r = 0.9, β = 0.1, R = 8, and T / D = 0.014. Conservative equations were proposed for Δ p considering β , R , and T / D with r = 0.0, giving a coefficient of determination R 2 of 0.89. For N c , using r = 0.3 as a practical upper‐bound representative of common structures, conservative equations were proposed with R 2 of 0.91. The mean Δ p and cumulative TOFD displacement of the rocking structure subjected to the ground motion suite were similar to those from SDOF systems with matching β , R , r , and T . The empirical equations provided conservative predictions for the rocking‐structure responses.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IR), University of Auckland (NZ), University of Canterbury (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
University of Canterbury, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.