Financial Payments From Drug Manufacturers to Oncologists and Use of Guideline-Preferred Cancer Treatments

PURPOSE: Payments from the drug industry influence physicians' prescribing decisions. Whether industry payments affect the likelihood that patients receive the guideline-preferred treatment for their cancer is unknown. METHODS: We used fee-for-service Medicare claims to identify patients with an incident cancer diagnosis from 2014 to 2020. We used the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines to identify cancers with variation in clinical benefit among recommended treatment options and to identify the preferred treatment as of each patient's diagnosis date. The primary exposure was drug industry payments received by the patient's medical oncologist during the year before diagnosis, categorized as no payment, payment for preferred treatment only, payment for nonpreferred treatment only, or payment for both. The primary outcome was receipt of a preferred treatment. RESULTS: There were 14 cancer scenarios comprising 15,607 patients; 60.2% were managed by oncologists who received no payment, 21.9% by oncologists who received payment for guideline-preferred treatment, 30.6% by oncologists who received payment for nonpreferred treatment, and 12.7% by oncologists who received both payment types. Among patients whose oncologist received no payments, 41.6% received payments for preferred treatment versus 51.5% of those whose oncologist received payments for guideline-preferred treatment only, 34.7% of those whose oncologist received payments for nonpreferred treatment only, and 42.9% of those whose oncologist received payments for both payment types. After adjustment, payment for guideline-preferred treatment was associated with a greater likelihood of receiving preferred treatment (risk ratio [RR] = 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.13]) and payment for nonpreferred treatment was associated with a lower likelihood (RR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.89 to 0.98]). Association magnitude increased as payment dollar value increased. CONCLUSION: Industry payments were associated with increased use of the promoted cancer treatment, regardless of whether that treatment was guideline-preferred or nonpreferred for a given patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-26-00785
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Financial Payments From Drug Manufacturers to Oncologists and Use of Guideline-Preferred Cancer Treatments

Peter B. Bach, Nina Galanter, Aaron Philip Mitchell, Nirjhar Chakraborty et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Financial Payments From Drug Manufacturers to Oncologists and Use of Guideline-Preferred Cancer Treatments

Peter B. Bach, Nina Galanter, Aaron Philip Mitchell, Nirjhar Chakraborty, Stacie B. Dusetzina, Grace Gallagher, Mithat Gönen, Akriti Mishra Meza, Aaron N. Winn, Susan Alsamarai, S. Vincent Rajkumar, Abdullah Abdelaziz, Patrick Augello, Maria Klimchuk, Gabrielle Guzman
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Payments from the drug industry influence physicians' prescribing decisions. Whether industry payments affect the likelihood that patients receive the guideline-preferred treatment for their cancer is unknown. METHODS: We used fee-for-service Medicare claims to identify patients with an incident cancer diagnosis from 2014 to 2020. We used the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines to identify cancers with variation in clinical benefit among recommended treatment options and to identify the preferred treatment as of each patient's diagnosis date. The primary exposure was drug industry payments received by the patient's medical oncologist during the year before diagnosis, categorized as no payment, payment for preferred treatment only, payment for nonpreferred treatment only, or payment for both. The primary outcome was receipt of a preferred treatment. RESULTS: There were 14 cancer scenarios comprising 15,607 patients; 60.2% were managed by oncologists who received no payment, 21.9% by oncologists who received payment for guideline-preferred treatment, 30.6% by oncologists who received payment for nonpreferred treatment, and 12.7% by oncologists who received both payment types. Among patients whose oncologist received no payments, 41.6% received payments for preferred treatment versus 51.5% of those whose oncologist received payments for guideline-preferred treatment only, 34.7% of those whose oncologist received payments for nonpreferred treatment only, and 42.9% of those whose oncologist received payments for both payment types. After adjustment, payment for guideline-preferred treatment was associated with a greater likelihood of receiving preferred treatment (risk ratio [RR] = 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.13]) and payment for nonpreferred treatment was associated with a lower likelihood (RR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.89 to 0.98]). Association magnitude increased as payment dollar value increased. CONCLUSION: Industry payments were associated with increased use of the promoted cancer treatment, regardless of whether that treatment was guideline-preferred or nonpreferred for a given patient.

Journal of Clinical Oncology
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Midstate Medical Center (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.