Desirable future(s) of heritage narratives

Purpose This article takes a comparative and by neutral standpoint (as far as possible), taking into account four overlapping bodies of contemporary museums/heritage scholarship that together reframe what museums and heritage sites are for: the critical-narrative literature on heritage as identity-making; the human-rights and Faro-Convention literature that recasts heritage as a participatory entitlement; the eco-museum and sociomuseological tradition that treats communities as the primary narrators of their own heritage and the heritage-futures ideas/literature that argues heritage is principally about assembling, regenerating and even partnering with decay rather than freezing the past. Design/methodology/approach This article takes a comparative and by far deliberately neutral standpoint. The article does not adjudicate between before mentioned bodies of work. It asks instead what shared direction of travel they trace, and what a desirable future of museum and heritage narratives might therefore look like – without proposing a single doctrine. Findings The desirable future of heritage narratives, as drawn by the four bodies (critical-heritage studies, Faro Convention, sociomuseology, heritage futures) of scholarship considered here, is best understood as a horizon rather than a doctrine. It is a horizon in which museums and heritage are read as future-conditional rather than past-tense devices. Set side by side, the four bodies of work above do not collapse into a single doctrine, their philosophical commitments are different. They however converge on at least three movements, from object-fixation toward relations-and-processes, from authorised expertise toward dialogical authorship and from past-conservation toward future-assembly that includes non-human life. Practical implications Presented theories could be implicated in everyday practical work. Social implications The study helped in different understanding of heritage, as well as the social role of heritage. Originality/value The article is providing an overview of the ideas in the field of heritage, the paper is useful to the readers who are interested to further develop heritage theories (with possible implementation in practices) and projections into future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-04-2026-0292
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Desirable future(s) of heritage narratives

Darko Babic
Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Desirable future(s) of heritage narratives

Darko Babic
article en

Abstract

Purpose This article takes a comparative and by neutral standpoint (as far as possible), taking into account four overlapping bodies of contemporary museums/heritage scholarship that together reframe what museums and heritage sites are for: the critical-narrative literature on heritage as identity-making; the human-rights and Faro-Convention literature that recasts heritage as a participatory entitlement; the eco-museum and sociomuseological tradition that treats communities as the primary narrators of their own heritage and the heritage-futures ideas/literature that argues heritage is principally about assembling, regenerating and even partnering with decay rather than freezing the past. Design/methodology/approach This article takes a comparative and by far deliberately neutral standpoint. The article does not adjudicate between before mentioned bodies of work. It asks instead what shared direction of travel they trace, and what a desirable future of museum and heritage narratives might therefore look like – without proposing a single doctrine. Findings The desirable future of heritage narratives, as drawn by the four bodies (critical-heritage studies, Faro Convention, sociomuseology, heritage futures) of scholarship considered here, is best understood as a horizon rather than a doctrine. It is a horizon in which museums and heritage are read as future-conditional rather than past-tense devices. Set side by side, the four bodies of work above do not collapse into a single doctrine, their philosophical commitments are different. They however converge on at least three movements, from object-fixation toward relations-and-processes, from authorised expertise toward dialogical authorship and from past-conservation toward future-assembly that includes non-human life. Practical implications Presented theories could be implicated in everyday practical work. Social implications The study helped in different understanding of heritage, as well as the social role of heritage. Originality/value The article is providing an overview of the ideas in the field of heritage, the paper is useful to the readers who are interested to further develop heritage theories (with possible implementation in practices) and projections into future.

Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
University of Zagreb (HR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.