Interfacial Microchemistry and Surface Stability of Monolithic and Layered Dental Restorative Systems: A Comparative SEM–EDS–XPS Study

Background/Objectives: Restorative system configuration may influence the surface chemistry and interfacial behavior of dental ceramic and metal–ceramic systems, but direct comparative evaluations integrating SEM, EDS, and XPS remain limited. Methods: This in vitro study compared three restorative configurations: Monolithic ZrO2, Feldspar/ZrO2, and Feldspar/Co-Cr. Thirty specimens were fabricated and allocated into three groups (n = 10/group). Surface and cross-sectional morphology were assessed by scanning electron microscopy, while elemental composition and interfacial transition patterns were evaluated using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, including point analysis, elemental mapping, and line-scan profiles. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to characterize material-specific surface chemical profiles. Results: Monolithic ZrO2 showed a compact and homogeneous ceramic morphology, with a dominant Zr–O–Y chemical profile. Feldspar/ZrO2 specimens exhibited a sharply defined ceramic–ceramic interface, with limited elemental overlap between the feldspathic veneer and zirconia core. In contrast, Feldspar/Co-Cr specimens showed a broader ceramic–metal transition zone, mainly supported by SEM–EDS evidence of Cr-, Co-, and O-related interfacial signals. XPS provided complementary surface chemical information, without definitive oxide phase identification. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the analyzed restorative configurations exhibited distinct morphological, elemental, and surface chemical patterns. Feldspar/Co-Cr showed a broader ceramic–metal elemental transition than Feldspar/ZrO2; however, the present findings should not be interpreted as evidence of superior bond strength, mechanical stability, fatigue resistance, or clinical performance. Further mechanical and aging studies are required to determine the functional significance of these interfacial differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14090596
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Interfacial Microchemistry and Surface Stability of Monolithic and Layered Dental Restorative Systems: A Comparative SEM–EDS–XPS Study

Kamel Earar, Dorin Ioan Cocoș, Diana Ramona Feier, Cristian Boanca
Dentistry Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

Interfacial Microchemistry and Surface Stability of Monolithic and Layered Dental Restorative Systems: A Comparative SEM–EDS–XPS Study

Kamel Earar, Dorin Ioan Cocoș, Diana Ramona Feier, Cristian Boanca
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Restorative system configuration may influence the surface chemistry and interfacial behavior of dental ceramic and metal–ceramic systems, but direct comparative evaluations integrating SEM, EDS, and XPS remain limited. Methods: This in vitro study compared three restorative configurations: Monolithic ZrO2, Feldspar/ZrO2, and Feldspar/Co-Cr. Thirty specimens were fabricated and allocated into three groups (n = 10/group). Surface and cross-sectional morphology were assessed by scanning electron microscopy, while elemental composition and interfacial transition patterns were evaluated using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, including point analysis, elemental mapping, and line-scan profiles. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to characterize material-specific surface chemical profiles. Results: Monolithic ZrO2 showed a compact and homogeneous ceramic morphology, with a dominant Zr–O–Y chemical profile. Feldspar/ZrO2 specimens exhibited a sharply defined ceramic–ceramic interface, with limited elemental overlap between the feldspathic veneer and zirconia core. In contrast, Feldspar/Co-Cr specimens showed a broader ceramic–metal transition zone, mainly supported by SEM–EDS evidence of Cr-, Co-, and O-related interfacial signals. XPS provided complementary surface chemical information, without definitive oxide phase identification. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the analyzed restorative configurations exhibited distinct morphological, elemental, and surface chemical patterns. Feldspar/Co-Cr showed a broader ceramic–metal elemental transition than Feldspar/ZrO2; however, the present findings should not be interpreted as evidence of superior bond strength, mechanical stability, fatigue resistance, or clinical performance. Further mechanical and aging studies are required to determine the functional significance of these interfacial differences.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(9)
"Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati (RO), Dimitrie Cantemir University (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.