It’s Not U(sher), It’s the System – Towards Co-Created Pathways of Support?

Young people living with Usher syndrome navigate adolescence in intersection with a progressive combined vision and hearing impairment. This article is part of a Danish action research project involving three Future Workshops with young people with Usher syndrome (n=8), relatives (n=7), and deafblind consultants (n=6). The article is based solely on data from the workshop with young people to examine how support becomes meaningful from their perspective. The main argument is that deafblind counselling is experienced as meaningful when it helps young people create and protect spaces where autonomy and identity can be exercised. The analysis also shows how such spaces are threatened by institutional logics and bureaucratic fragmentation. By combining perspectives from disability studies on ableism with Bamberg’s (2011) model of identity dilemmas, the article shows how young people actively negotiate identity and agency within welfare systems not fully adapted to a life with a progressive impairment. Thus, the article points to the need for co-created pathways of support that align professional practices with young people’s lived temporalities and their pursuit of autonomy and space. This contributes to debates on the Nordic welfare model by examining how welfare services, despite their inclusive ambitions, can unintentionally constrain young people’s autonomy when support is organised around predefined service packages and administrative timelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordisk välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare Research
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18261/nwr.11.3.2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

It’s Not U(sher), It’s the System – Towards Co-Created Pathways of Support?

Chalotte Glintborg, Niels-Henrik Møller Hansen, Vibeke Andersen, Rasmus Hougaard Pedersen et al.
1 citations
Nordisk välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare Research
Disability Rights and Representation
6.20
article

It’s Not U(sher), It’s the System – Towards Co-Created Pathways of Support?

Chalotte Glintborg, Niels-Henrik Møller Hansen, Vibeke Andersen, Rasmus Hougaard Pedersen, Anja Nielsen, Eva Juul Toldam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Young people living with Usher syndrome navigate adolescence in intersection with a progressive combined vision and hearing impairment. This article is part of a Danish action research project involving three Future Workshops with young people with Usher syndrome (n=8), relatives (n=7), and deafblind consultants (n=6). The article is based solely on data from the workshop with young people to examine how support becomes meaningful from their perspective. The main argument is that deafblind counselling is experienced as meaningful when it helps young people create and protect spaces where autonomy and identity can be exercised. The analysis also shows how such spaces are threatened by institutional logics and bureaucratic fragmentation. By combining perspectives from disability studies on ableism with Bamberg’s (2011) model of identity dilemmas, the article shows how young people actively negotiate identity and agency within welfare systems not fully adapted to a life with a progressive impairment. Thus, the article points to the need for co-created pathways of support that align professional practices with young people’s lived temporalities and their pursuit of autonomy and space. This contributes to debates on the Nordic welfare model by examining how welfare services, despite their inclusive ambitions, can unintentionally constrain young people’s autonomy when support is organised around predefined service packages and administrative timelines.

Nordisk välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare ResearchVol. 11(3)
Copenhagen Institute for Futures Studies (DK), Mech-Sense (DK), Crescent Development Foundation (PK), Aalborg University (DK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Disability Rights and Representation
6.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.