Quantifying temporal vulnerability of urban multi-modal transit networks under interdependent cascading failures

Multi-modal public transit networks (MPTNs) are vulnerable to service disruptions that might diminish their utility and cause severe consequences. The present study assesses the vulnerability of MPTNs under different operating scenarios. By combining network topology, dynamic evolution, and passenger interchange characteristics, we propose a vulnerability assessment framework. The proposed assessment relies on dynamic flow redistribution rules based on the interlayer transfer coefficient and sequential network characteristic indicators, which are crucial for improving service quality and mitigating cascading failures. The results indicate that MPTNs are less vulnerable as station capacity increases. Moreover, MPTNs are more robust during off-peak scenarios. However, when a failure occurs, the vulnerability of the network increases with the interlayer flow coefficient. These insights facilitate the determination of reasonable capacity parameters for stations within specific ranges. Furthermore, the study enables the identification of critical cascade-propagation steps for effectively managing and mitigating cascading failures following a disruption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-67177-7
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Quantifying temporal vulnerability of urban multi-modal transit networks under interdependent cascading failures

Chuntong Dong, Yulong Pei, Ziqi Wang, Jie Zhang
Scientific Reports
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

Quantifying temporal vulnerability of urban multi-modal transit networks under interdependent cascading failures

Chuntong Dong, Yulong Pei, Ziqi Wang, Jie Zhang
article en

Abstract

Multi-modal public transit networks (MPTNs) are vulnerable to service disruptions that might diminish their utility and cause severe consequences. The present study assesses the vulnerability of MPTNs under different operating scenarios. By combining network topology, dynamic evolution, and passenger interchange characteristics, we propose a vulnerability assessment framework. The proposed assessment relies on dynamic flow redistribution rules based on the interlayer transfer coefficient and sequential network characteristic indicators, which are crucial for improving service quality and mitigating cascading failures. The results indicate that MPTNs are less vulnerable as station capacity increases. Moreover, MPTNs are more robust during off-peak scenarios. However, when a failure occurs, the vulnerability of the network increases with the interlayer flow coefficient. These insights facilitate the determination of reasonable capacity parameters for stations within specific ranges. Furthermore, the study enables the identification of critical cascade-propagation steps for effectively managing and mitigating cascading failures following a disruption.

Scientific Reports
Ningde Normal University (CN), Tongling University (CN), Northeast Forestry University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying temporal vulnerability of urban multi-modal transit networks under interdependent cascading failures — Chuntong Dong, Yulong Pei, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS