‘Whose Language Counts?’ Linguistic Racism, Gen‐AI, and Policy Silence in Polish and Romanian AI Governance

ABSTRACT As generative artificial intelligence spreads through European education, its development continues to be shaped overwhelmingly by English and other dominant languages. This article examines how national AI and digital education policies in Poland and Romania discursively construct a linguistically homogeneous ‘ideal learner,’ rendering Roma and refugee learners invisible in policy. Drawing on comparative critical discourse analysis of four national policy documents alongside three civil society reports, the analysis identifies three patterns: technocratic and economic nationalist discourse that presupposes linguistic homogeneity; rhetorical commitments to inclusion that erase linguistic diversity in practice; and the complete absence of guidance on linguistic variation in teacher preparation. Situating these dynamics within post‐socialist legacies of centralized linguistic governance, the article argues that AI governance operates as implicit language policy, and that treating it as such is a necessary condition for contesting the linguistic hierarchies these systems reproduce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70378
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

‘Whose Language Counts?’ Linguistic Racism, Gen‐AI, and Policy Silence in Polish and Romanian AI Governance

Florin D. Salajan, Anna Becker
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

‘Whose Language Counts?’ Linguistic Racism, Gen‐AI, and Policy Silence in Polish and Romanian AI Governance

Florin D. Salajan, Anna Becker
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As generative artificial intelligence spreads through European education, its development continues to be shaped overwhelmingly by English and other dominant languages. This article examines how national AI and digital education policies in Poland and Romania discursively construct a linguistically homogeneous ‘ideal learner,’ rendering Roma and refugee learners invisible in policy. Drawing on comparative critical discourse analysis of four national policy documents alongside three civil society reports, the analysis identifies three patterns: technocratic and economic nationalist discourse that presupposes linguistic homogeneity; rhetorical commitments to inclusion that erase linguistic diversity in practice; and the complete absence of guidance on linguistic variation in teacher preparation. Situating these dynamics within post‐socialist legacies of centralized linguistic governance, the article argues that AI governance operates as implicit language policy, and that treating it as such is a necessary condition for contesting the linguistic hierarchies these systems reproduce.

International Journal of Applied Linguistics
North Dakota State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Whose Language Counts?’ Linguistic Racism, Gen‐AI, and Policy Silence in Polish and Romanian AI Governance — Florin D. Salajan, Anna Becker · International Journal of Applied Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS