Through the Teachers' Eyes—Primary School Teachers' Perceptions of Knowledge to Inform Their Practice

ABSTRACT This qualitative multiple case study examines teachers' perceptions of what knowledge they find useful, with our two cases being academically and non‐academically trained early‐career primary school teachers. Six teachers were interviewed to explore how different forms of knowledge influence their teaching practices. Findings indicated that while our two cases used a combination of sources to shape their practice, the academically trained teachers made more reference to scientific research. Non‐academically trained teachers expressed openness to scientific evidence, but struggled to engage with it due to lack of accessibility, practical challenges, and a tendency to prioritize experiential knowledge. Ultimately, both groups saw value in practical, immediately implementable knowledge that meets the specific needs of their classrooms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70874
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Through the Teachers' Eyes—Primary School Teachers' Perceptions of Knowledge to Inform Their Practice

Thibault Coppe, Madelief van der Velden
European Journal of Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Through the Teachers' Eyes—Primary School Teachers' Perceptions of Knowledge to Inform Their Practice

Thibault Coppe, Madelief van der Velden
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This qualitative multiple case study examines teachers' perceptions of what knowledge they find useful, with our two cases being academically and non‐academically trained early‐career primary school teachers. Six teachers were interviewed to explore how different forms of knowledge influence their teaching practices. Findings indicated that while our two cases used a combination of sources to shape their practice, the academically trained teachers made more reference to scientific research. Non‐academically trained teachers expressed openness to scientific evidence, but struggled to engage with it due to lack of accessibility, practical challenges, and a tendency to prioritize experiential knowledge. Ultimately, both groups saw value in practical, immediately implementable knowledge that meets the specific needs of their classrooms.

European Journal of EducationVol. 61(4)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), University of Groningen (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.