Reducing antibiotics? experimental evidence from poultry farmers in China

Antibiotic overuse in the livestock sector has negative environmental implications and leads to bacterial resistance. We set up a randomized controlled trial in two locations in China among poultry farmers to evaluate the effects of a two-pronged approach: Providing micro- subsidies for alternative production methods and exposing farmers to differential norms through role models. These interventions, alone or combined, resulted in no detectable effects on antibiotic use and profits. However, in the wealthier location, the combination of the two interventions prompted the use of alternative technologies. However, the degree of take-up was limited, and the recommended accompanying changes in sanitation measures were not fully implemented (although sanitation measures improved, possibly due to the information campaign, which was delivered to all farmers at the start of the study). No such behavioural changes were observed in the poorer location (although this lack of effects might also be partially due to supply constraints in the poorer location).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Development
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107555
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Reducing antibiotics? experimental evidence from poultry farmers in China

Meike Wollni, Annemie Maertens, Jiazhu Wei, Li Zhou et al.
World Development
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Reducing antibiotics? experimental evidence from poultry farmers in China

Meike Wollni, Annemie Maertens, Jiazhu Wei, Li Zhou, Lingzhi Li
article en

Abstract

Antibiotic overuse in the livestock sector has negative environmental implications and leads to bacterial resistance. We set up a randomized controlled trial in two locations in China among poultry farmers to evaluate the effects of a two-pronged approach: Providing micro- subsidies for alternative production methods and exposing farmers to differential norms through role models. These interventions, alone or combined, resulted in no detectable effects on antibiotic use and profits. However, in the wealthier location, the combination of the two interventions prompted the use of alternative technologies. However, the degree of take-up was limited, and the recommended accompanying changes in sanitation measures were not fully implemented (although sanitation measures improved, possibly due to the information campaign, which was delivered to all farmers at the start of the study). No such behavioural changes were observed in the poorer location (although this lack of effects might also be partially due to supply constraints in the poorer location).

World DevelopmentVol. 209
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), University of Sussex (GB), China Development Bank (CN), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US), Bank of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reducing antibiotics? experimental evidence from poultry farmers in China — Meike Wollni, Annemie Maertens, et al. · World Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS