Contextual assessment of perceived health system alignment with National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care in the American Southeast

PURPOSE: We assessed perceived alignment of a large health system in the American Southeast with the National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care (National Standards). METHODS: We engaged key partners and distributed an electronic survey to oncology practices within the system. In parallel, in four representative clinics we collected qualitative data including four clinic observations and 12 semi structured interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: Of the 51 informants at practices who received the survey, 16 consented, and 10 completed at least one item. On average, informants reported meeting 55% of the survivorship care National Standards at least some of the time. Facilitators and barriers for National Standards implementation were identified in these CFIR Domains: Characteristics of the Individuals (e.g., believed to be beneficial for improving and standardizing care), Outer Setting (e.g., need to be linked to an incentive), Inner Setting (e.g., need for more provider training on what is available), Intervention Characteristics (e.g., difficult to understand), and Process (e.g., important decision-makers). CONCLUSIONS: While most informants reported meeting at least half of the National Standards, there was variability in how consistently National Standards were perceived as applied across practices. Further, there was likely bias, with more favorable responses from those who chose to complete the survey than those who did not. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These data demonstrate a systematic approach for assessing alignment with National Standards and identifying opportunities for improving survivorship care. A model that combines standardized survivorship services with flexibility to meet local population needs may help reduce gaps in care, promote equitable access to supportive resources, and enhance outcomes for cancer survivors across diverse settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-026-02123-0
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Contextual assessment of perceived health system alignment with National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care in the American Southeast

Beth York, Carla Strom, Beth Fisher, R. Zimmer et al.
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Contextual assessment of perceived health system alignment with National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care in the American Southeast

Beth York, Carla Strom, Beth Fisher, R. Zimmer, Alana Willis, Sarah A. Birken, Chandylen Nightingale, Ashley Strahley, Stephanie Bunch, Sarah Zakrzewski, Stephanie J. Sohl, Shirley M. Bluethmann
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed perceived alignment of a large health system in the American Southeast with the National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care (National Standards). METHODS: We engaged key partners and distributed an electronic survey to oncology practices within the system. In parallel, in four representative clinics we collected qualitative data including four clinic observations and 12 semi structured interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: Of the 51 informants at practices who received the survey, 16 consented, and 10 completed at least one item. On average, informants reported meeting 55% of the survivorship care National Standards at least some of the time. Facilitators and barriers for National Standards implementation were identified in these CFIR Domains: Characteristics of the Individuals (e.g., believed to be beneficial for improving and standardizing care), Outer Setting (e.g., need to be linked to an incentive), Inner Setting (e.g., need for more provider training on what is available), Intervention Characteristics (e.g., difficult to understand), and Process (e.g., important decision-makers). CONCLUSIONS: While most informants reported meeting at least half of the National Standards, there was variability in how consistently National Standards were perceived as applied across practices. Further, there was likely bias, with more favorable responses from those who chose to complete the survey than those who did not. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These data demonstrate a systematic approach for assessing alignment with National Standards and identifying opportunities for improving survivorship care. A model that combines standardized survivorship services with flexibility to meet local population needs may help reduce gaps in care, promote equitable access to supportive resources, and enhance outcomes for cancer survivors across diverse settings.

Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Wake Forest University (US)
Wake Forest University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.