The Abiotic Background: Challenges and Opportunities in the Search for Evidence of Life Beyond Earth

{"The":[0,28],"\\"Exploring":[1],"the":[2,20,42,49,67,77,83,103,139,146,178,226,238,281,285,293,305,314,332],"Abiotic":[3],"Background":[4],"for":[5,23,69,148,248,257,280,307],"Life":[6],"Detection\\"":[7],"workshop":[8,29,84],"was":[9],"convened":[10],"between":[11,174],"March":[12],"31,":[13],"2025,":[14,18],"and":[15,32,37,47,55,79,95,98,118,126,135,163,177,220,231,261,272,300,339,351],"April":[16],"3,":[17],"at":[19],"Carnegie":[21],"Institution":[22],"Science":[24],"in":[25,60,66,159,284,296,346],"Washington,":[26],"D.C.":[27],"gathered":[30],"scientists":[31],"technologists":[33],"from":[34,93,321],"different":[35],"disciplines":[36],"career":[38],"stages":[39],"to":[40,182,205,215,223,236,268,277,313],"consider":[41],"\\"abiotic":[43],"background\\":":[44],"recognizing,":[45],"characterizing,":[46],"understanding":[48,330],"set":[50],"of":[51,71,123,141,150,166,192,228,240,287,298,316,331,348],"abiotic":[52,108,229,233,249,282,333],"substances,":[53],"structures,":[54],"processes":[56],"that":[57,319,327],"may":[58],"result":[59],"potential":[61],"false-positive":[62],"or":[63],"false-negative":[64],"results":[65],"search":[68,147],"evidence":[70],"life":[72,151],"beyond":[73,152],"Earth.":[74],"To":[75],"frame":[76],"conversation":[78],"ensure":[80],"programmatic":[81],"relevance,":[82],"emphasized":[85],"Ocean":[86,186],"Worlds,":[87],"while":[88],"also":[89],"leveraging":[90],"lessons":[91],"learned":[92],"modern":[94],"early":[96],"Earth":[97,153],"Mars.":[99],"Salient":[100],"takeaways":[101],"include":[102],"following:":[104],"(1)":[105],"a":[106,155,171,189,213,244,254,270,308],"large":[107],"background,":[109],"potentially":[110],"sustained":[111,271],"over":[112],"geologic":[113],"timescales,":[114],"could":[115,252],"mimic,":[116],"obscure,":[117],"alter":[119],"biosignatures,":[120],"posing":[121],"risks":[122,299],"false":[124,127],"positives":[125],"negatives.":[128],"Addressing":[129],"these":[130],"challenges":[131],"requires":[132],"balancing":[133],"targeted":[134],"untargeted":[136],"measurements":[137],"within":[138],"constraints":[140,180],"robotic":[142,183],"spacecraft":[143,160,241,289,343],"payloads;":[144],"(2)":[145],"signatures":[149],"represents":[154],"sharp":[156],"inflection":[157],"point":[158],"mission":[161,259],"complexity":[162],"design.":[164],"Stakeholders":[165],"such":[167],"missions":[168],"must":[169],"strike":[170],"difficult":[172],"balance":[173],"scientific":[175,301],"aspirations":[176],"technological":[179],"inherent":[181],"spaceflight;":[184],"(3)":[185],"Worlds":[187],"are":[188],"distinct":[190],"class":[191],"habitable":[193],"environments,":[194],"each":[195],"with":[196],"unique":[197],"evolutionary":[198],"pathways,":[199],"but":[200],"collectively":[201],"offering":[202],"new":[203],"opportunities":[204],"study":[206],"organic":[207],"chemical":[208,250],"evolution;":[209],"(4)":[210],"there":[211],"is":[212],"need":[214],"establish":[216],"community-wide":[217],"experimental":[218],"standards":[219],"laboratory":[221],"simulations":[222],"better":[224],"constrain":[225],"range":[227],"chemistry":[230,234],"improve":[232,340],"models":[235],"guide":[237],"design":[239,286],"missions;":[242],"(5)":[243],"unifying,":[245],"predictive":[246],"framework":[247],"evolution":[251],"provide":[253],"robust":[255],"baseline":[256],"interpreting":[258],"data":[260,352],"guiding":[262],"future":[263,341],"exploration.":[264],"This":[265],"report":[266],"seeks":[267],"catalyze":[269],"focused":[273],"dialogue":[274],"on":[275],"how":[276],"best":[278],"account":[279],"background":[283,334],"astrobiology":[288],"missions.":[290],"By":[291],"framing":[292],"issue":[294],"both":[295],"terms":[297,347],"opportunities,":[302],"we":[303],"lay":[304],"groundwork":[306],"richer,":[309],"more":[310],"integrated":[311],"approach":[312],"exploration":[315],"other":[317],"worlds":[318],"benefits":[320],"continued":[322],"cross-disciplinary":[323],"input.":[324],"We":[325],"contend":[326],"advancing":[328],"our":[329],"now":[335],"will":[336],"directly":[337],"inform":[338],"astrobiological":[342],"missions,":[344],"particularly":[345],"payload":[349],"selection":[350],"interpretation.":[353]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astrobiology
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15311074261484864
Primary Topic
Origins and Evolution of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Abiotic Background: Challenges and Opportunities in the Search for Evidence of Life Beyond Earth

Laura M. Barge, Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy, Michel Nuevo, Alexis Bouquet et al.
Astrobiology
Origins and Evolution of Life
article

The Abiotic Background: Challenges and Opportunities in the Search for Evidence of Life Beyond Earth

Laura M. Barge, Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy, Michel Nuevo, Alexis Bouquet, Grégoire Danger, J. D. Seewald, Ichiko Sugiyama, Svetlana Shkolyar, Aaron Burton, Tori Hoehler, and the Workshop Participants, Moran Frenkel-Pinter, Kevin Hand, Shannon MacKenzie, H. James Cleaves, Christopher German, Aaron Noell, Christopher Glein, Morgan Cable, Karyn Rogers, Andrew D. Czaja, Alfonso Dávila, Kristin Johnson-Finn, Jacob Buffo, Stephanie Getty, Heather Graham, Frank Postberg, Barbara Sherwood Lollar, Andrew Steele, Sara Hörst, Wanying Kang, Andro Rios
article en

Abstract

The "Exploring the Abiotic Background for Life Detection" workshop was convened between March 31, 2025, and April 3, 2025, at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C. The workshop gathered scientists and technologists from different disciplines and career stages to consider the "abiotic background": recognizing, characterizing, and understanding the set of abiotic substances, structures, and processes that may result in potential false-positive or false-negative results in the search for evidence of life beyond Earth. To frame the conversation and ensure programmatic relevance, the workshop emphasized Ocean Worlds, while also leveraging lessons learned from modern and early Earth and Mars. Salient takeaways include the following: (1) a large abiotic background, potentially sustained over geologic timescales, could mimic, obscure, and alter biosignatures, posing risks of false positives and false negatives. Addressing these challenges requires balancing targeted and untargeted measurements within the constraints of robotic spacecraft payloads; (2) the search for signatures of life beyond Earth represents a sharp inflection point in spacecraft mission complexity and design. Stakeholders of such missions must strike a difficult balance between scientific aspirations and the technological constraints inherent to robotic spaceflight; (3) Ocean Worlds are a distinct class of habitable environments, each with unique evolutionary pathways, but collectively offering new opportunities to study organic chemical evolution; (4) there is a need to establish community-wide experimental standards and laboratory simulations to better constrain the range of abiotic chemistry and improve abiotic chemistry models to guide the design of spacecraft missions; (5) a unifying, predictive framework for abiotic chemical evolution could provide a robust baseline for interpreting mission data and guiding future exploration. This report seeks to catalyze a sustained and focused dialogue on how to best account for the abiotic background in the design of astrobiology spacecraft missions. By framing the issue both in terms of risks and scientific opportunities, we lay the groundwork for a richer, more integrated approach to the exploration of other worlds that benefits from continued cross-disciplinary input. We contend that advancing our understanding of the abiotic background now will directly inform and improve future astrobiological spacecraft missions, particularly in terms of payload selection and data interpretation.

Astrobiology
Dartmouth College (US), Scripps Research Institute (US), Ames Research Center (US), Southwest Research Institute (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Planetary Science Institute (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Howard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US), University of Toronto (CA), Carnegie Institution for Science (US), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), San Jose State University (US), University of Cincinnati (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Planetary Science Division
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Origins and Evolution of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.