Leveraging the Untapped Potential of Research Conversations

Abstract Students participate in research conversations for complex reasons including the desire to advance knowledge and influence policy about issues that matter to them. Further, the opportunity to feel seen and heard is a benefit students receive from being asked to articulate their thoughts and feelings. In this article, we explore our experiences as qualitative researchers whose participants guided them into this new terrain of participant motivation. We found feedback provided during member-checking, advocacy, and opportunities for reflection to be the primary ways students experienced value in being research participants. We identify the implications of our findings about participants’ motivations and situate them within the context of our experiences navigating higher education institutions driven by industrial logic. We offer recommendations grounded in these experiences and the related interdisciplinary scholarship.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Innovative Higher Education
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-026-09956-8
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Leveraging the Untapped Potential of Research Conversations

Laura M. Harrison, Becky Challenger
Innovative Higher Education
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Leveraging the Untapped Potential of Research Conversations

Laura M. Harrison, Becky Challenger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Students participate in research conversations for complex reasons including the desire to advance knowledge and influence policy about issues that matter to them. Further, the opportunity to feel seen and heard is a benefit students receive from being asked to articulate their thoughts and feelings. In this article, we explore our experiences as qualitative researchers whose participants guided them into this new terrain of participant motivation. We found feedback provided during member-checking, advocacy, and opportunities for reflection to be the primary ways students experienced value in being research participants. We identify the implications of our findings about participants’ motivations and situate them within the context of our experiences navigating higher education institutions driven by industrial logic. We offer recommendations grounded in these experiences and the related interdisciplinary scholarship.

Innovative Higher Education
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.