Understanding the Exposed Area Dependent Photoelectrochemical Performance of BiVO4 Photoanodes

Abstract To enable meaningful comparisons in solar fuel production, the energy conversion efficiency of photoelectrodes must be evaluated using standardized benchmarking protocols. For solar water splitting, the photocurrent density at a defined potential in a three-electrode configuration (e.g., 1.23 V vs. RHE for water oxidation) is widely used. However, this single descriptor is often insufficient for reliable cross-comparison between studies. In many reports, the highest photocurrent densities are obtained under conditions where the entire geometric electrode area (typically several cm2) is illuminated, while only a small fraction (<0.1 cm2) is in contact with the electrolyte. This discrepancy highlights the critical role of the fabricated or illuminated-to-exposed area ratio on the measured performance. In the present study, we systematically investigate the dependence of photocurrent density on the exposed-to-fabricated area ratio of bismuth vanadate (BiVO4) photoanodes prepared using state-of-the-art methods. By combining electrochemical, spectroscopic and structural characterization, we elucidate how this geometric factor governs the apparent photoelectrochemical response. Our results demonstrate that photocurrent metrics are highly sensitive to mismatches between illuminated, fabricated, and electrolyte-exposed areas, underscoring the need for more transparent and standardized reporting protocols to ensure meaningful benchmarking of photoelectrodes across studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Measurement Science Au
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.6c00248
Primary Topic
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Understanding the Exposed Area Dependent Photoelectrochemical Performance of BiVO4 Photoanodes

Camilo A. Mesa, Laura Montañés, Sixto Giménez, Ana Gutiérrez‐Blanco et al.
ACS Measurement Science Au
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
article

Understanding the Exposed Area Dependent Photoelectrochemical Performance of BiVO4 Photoanodes

Camilo A. Mesa, Laura Montañés, Sixto Giménez, Ana Gutiérrez‐Blanco, Christian Robles, Francisco Fabregat‐Santiago, Agustín O. Alvarez
article en

Abstract

Abstract To enable meaningful comparisons in solar fuel production, the energy conversion efficiency of photoelectrodes must be evaluated using standardized benchmarking protocols. For solar water splitting, the photocurrent density at a defined potential in a three-electrode configuration (e.g., 1.23 V vs. RHE for water oxidation) is widely used. However, this single descriptor is often insufficient for reliable cross-comparison between studies. In many reports, the highest photocurrent densities are obtained under conditions where the entire geometric electrode area (typically several cm2) is illuminated, while only a small fraction (<0.1 cm2) is in contact with the electrolyte. This discrepancy highlights the critical role of the fabricated or illuminated-to-exposed area ratio on the measured performance. In the present study, we systematically investigate the dependence of photocurrent density on the exposed-to-fabricated area ratio of bismuth vanadate (BiVO4) photoanodes prepared using state-of-the-art methods. By combining electrochemical, spectroscopic and structural characterization, we elucidate how this geometric factor governs the apparent photoelectrochemical response. Our results demonstrate that photocurrent metrics are highly sensitive to mismatches between illuminated, fabricated, and electrolyte-exposed areas, underscoring the need for more transparent and standardized reporting protocols to ensure meaningful benchmarking of photoelectrodes across studies.

ACS Measurement Science Au
Universitat Jaume I (ES), Vitenparken (NO)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.