Quantifying the direct and indirect costs of reproduction

The energetic costs of reproduction remain incompletely resolved, despite being fundamental to life history theory. Recent work has drawn attention to indirect costs of reproduction and suggested that they may be underestimated in energy budget models. However, a challenge in the study and modelling of indirect reproductive costs is that definitions change conceptually between reproductive modes. Here, we offer a consistent and generalizable definition by taking the perspective of the mother rather than the empirical researcher. From our proposed perspective, the mother’s energy costs are partitioned into what she provisioned to the embryo (direct costs) and the energy expended to do the provisioning (indirect costs). This conceptual approach can be implemented quantitatively through a model that can quantify embryonic development and associated dissipation. We illustrate how the Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory allows such a quantification and what it implies about the empirical data necessary for a complete accounting of the energetic costs of reproduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Modelling
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111810
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Quantifying the direct and indirect costs of reproduction

S.A.L.M. Kooijman, Charlotte Récapet, Romain Lavaud, Michael Kearney et al.
Ecological Modelling
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Quantifying the direct and indirect costs of reproduction

S.A.L.M. Kooijman, Charlotte Récapet, Romain Lavaud, Michael Kearney, Konstadia Lika, Marko Jusup, Nina Marn
article en

Abstract

The energetic costs of reproduction remain incompletely resolved, despite being fundamental to life history theory. Recent work has drawn attention to indirect costs of reproduction and suggested that they may be underestimated in energy budget models. However, a challenge in the study and modelling of indirect reproductive costs is that definitions change conceptually between reproductive modes. Here, we offer a consistent and generalizable definition by taking the perspective of the mother rather than the empirical researcher. From our proposed perspective, the mother’s energy costs are partitioned into what she provisioned to the embryo (direct costs) and the energy expended to do the provisioning (indirect costs). This conceptual approach can be implemented quantitatively through a model that can quantify embryonic development and associated dissipation. We illustrate how the Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory allows such a quantification and what it implies about the empirical data necessary for a complete accounting of the energetic costs of reproduction.

Ecological ModellingVol. 522
University of Crete (GR), Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour (FR), The University of Melbourne (AU), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency (JP), Ruđer Bošković Institute (HR), Renewable Energy Systems (United States) (US), Life University (US)
Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost, Australian Research Council, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.