Multispecies Justice Through Interspecies Deliberation

In this paper, we argue that multispecies justice should be able to integrate diverse ontologies, especially relational ontologies that emphasize relationships between human and more-than-human beings. After reviewing three existing accounts, we develop an approach to interspecies deliberation that includes plants. We provide an outline of the deliberative procedure, discuss participation requirements, risks, an alternative deliberative paradigm, and the role of transdisciplinary research. Two case studies, drawing on socio-ecological and ecosystem perspectives, inform our analysis. Based on them, we propose a procedural, meliorist, and situated account of multispecies justice through interspecies deliberation that can inform decision-making in multispecies contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics Policy & Environment
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2026.2733100
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multispecies Justice Through Interspecies Deliberation

Thomas Rickard, Charbel Niño El-Hani, David Ludwig, Mariana Garcia-Medina et al.
Ethics Policy & Environment
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Multispecies Justice Through Interspecies Deliberation

Thomas Rickard, Charbel Niño El-Hani, David Ludwig, Mariana Garcia-Medina, Lúcia C. Neco, Matthias Kramm, Luana Poliseli
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that multispecies justice should be able to integrate diverse ontologies, especially relational ontologies that emphasize relationships between human and more-than-human beings. After reviewing three existing accounts, we develop an approach to interspecies deliberation that includes plants. We provide an outline of the deliberative procedure, discuss participation requirements, risks, an alternative deliberative paradigm, and the role of transdisciplinary research. Two case studies, drawing on socio-ecological and ecosystem perspectives, inform our analysis. Based on them, we propose a procedural, meliorist, and situated account of multispecies justice through interspecies deliberation that can inform decision-making in multispecies contexts.

Ethics Policy & Environment
University of Kassel (DE), Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), University of Manchester (GB), Oldham Council (GB), Universidad de Murcia (ES), University of Tübingen (DE), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.