In Vivo Comparison of Laser Fluorescence, Near-Infrared Transillumination, and Conventional Methods for Approximal Caries Detection

Background/Objectives: The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the diagnostic performance of conventional methods, including visual examination according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS II) and digital bite-wing radiography, with laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent Pen) and near-infrared transillumination (DIAGNOcam and VistaCam iX-Proxi head) for the detection of non-cavitated approximal caries and to evaluate inter-examiner agreement. Methods: A total of 76 non-cavitated posterior teeth/surfaces from patients aged 15–60 years were independently assessed by three investigators. Enamel caries validation was based on combined ICDAS II and bite-wing radiographic findings, whereas dentin caries validation was established by cavity opening and direct clinical assessment. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Inter-examiner agreement was assessed using the kappa coefficient, and diagnostic performance was compared using the McNemar test (p < 0.05). Results: Sensitivity ranged from 7.5% for visual examination to 94.3% for DIAGNOdent Pen, whereas specificity ranged from 12.6% to 100.0%. Bite-wing radiography demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (accuracy: 87.7%; AUC: 0.775), followed by DIAGNOcam (accuracy: 86.0%; AUC: 0.738) and VistaCam (accuracy: 84.2%; AUC: 0.720). Although DIAGNOdent Pen showed high sensitivity, its specificity and overall accuracy were low (31.6%; AUC: 0.535). Inter-examiner agreement was substantial for visual examination, bite-wing radiography, and DIAGNOcam, moderate for VistaCam, and slight for DIAGNOdent Pen. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, combining visual examination, digital bite-wing radiography, and near-infrared transillumination methods may improve the detection of approximal caries, particularly at an early stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187178
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

In Vivo Comparison of Laser Fluorescence, Near-Infrared Transillumination, and Conventional Methods for Approximal Caries Detection

Oya Bala, Sinem Akgül, Ceyda Sari, Arda Bingül
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

In Vivo Comparison of Laser Fluorescence, Near-Infrared Transillumination, and Conventional Methods for Approximal Caries Detection

Oya Bala, Sinem Akgül, Ceyda Sari, Arda Bingül
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the diagnostic performance of conventional methods, including visual examination according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS II) and digital bite-wing radiography, with laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent Pen) and near-infrared transillumination (DIAGNOcam and VistaCam iX-Proxi head) for the detection of non-cavitated approximal caries and to evaluate inter-examiner agreement. Methods: A total of 76 non-cavitated posterior teeth/surfaces from patients aged 15–60 years were independently assessed by three investigators. Enamel caries validation was based on combined ICDAS II and bite-wing radiographic findings, whereas dentin caries validation was established by cavity opening and direct clinical assessment. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Inter-examiner agreement was assessed using the kappa coefficient, and diagnostic performance was compared using the McNemar test (p < 0.05). Results: Sensitivity ranged from 7.5% for visual examination to 94.3% for DIAGNOdent Pen, whereas specificity ranged from 12.6% to 100.0%. Bite-wing radiography demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (accuracy: 87.7%; AUC: 0.775), followed by DIAGNOcam (accuracy: 86.0%; AUC: 0.738) and VistaCam (accuracy: 84.2%; AUC: 0.720). Although DIAGNOdent Pen showed high sensitivity, its specificity and overall accuracy were low (31.6%; AUC: 0.535). Inter-examiner agreement was substantial for visual examination, bite-wing radiography, and DIAGNOcam, moderate for VistaCam, and slight for DIAGNOdent Pen. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, combining visual examination, digital bite-wing radiography, and near-infrared transillumination methods may improve the detection of approximal caries, particularly at an early stage.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(18)
Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.