Sex-specific biological aging clocks across organs and omics
Sex differentially shapes aging, neurodevelopment and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, most biological aging clocks (artificial intelligence-predicted age minus chronological age) were trained on sex-pooled samples and implicitly assume sex invariance.Here we developed 38 sex-specific biological aging clocks across 15 organ systems. We first demonstrate the importance of sex-stratified training for constructing sex-specific healthy normative references and then reveal marked divergence between female and male clocks. Key genetic parameters and Mendelian randomization results indicate that organ-specific aging liability and its relationships to cardiometabolic, endocrine and mental traits are configured differently in females and males. Proteomic analyses identify distinct, organ-resolved synaptic, immune, vascular and metabolic networks that differentially track female and male biological aging. In longitudinal survival analyses, sex-specific clocks predict whole-body systemic diseases and all-cause mortality in a sex-dependent and organ-dependent manner. Further analyses reveal sex-dependent associations between the brain aging clock and cognitive decline trajectory during a preclinical AD clinical trial. Sex-stratified clocks may offer distinct value by defining biological age against sex-appropriate normative references and revealing sex-dependent genetic, molecular and clinical signatures that pooled models may obscure. Meanwhile, sex-pooled and sex-interaction approaches remain valuable, as human aging and disease also share fundamental biological similarities between females and males. Together, these findings reveal sex-specific biological aging signatures in aging, AD and systemic health, highlighting the need for explicitly sex-stratified modeling approaches.
Authors
- Susan M. Resnick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1115-7145)
- Chunrui Zou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7482-2678)
- Michael S. Rafii (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-2094)
- Andrew Zalesky (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-9908)
- Paul Aisen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2896-5838)
- Christos Davatzikos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1025-8561)
- Luigi Ferrucci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6273-1613)
- Michael R. Duggan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1029-4423)
- Qu Tian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2706-1439)
- Keenan A. Walker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5989-9853)
- Junhao Wen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-3070)
- Li Shen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5443-0503)
- Paul M. Thompson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4720-8867)
- Zhiyuan Song (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-6031)
- Jian Zeng
- Naowal Azraf Rahman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4307-9659)
- Derek Feng
- Xia Zhou
- Eleanor M. Simonsick
Institutions
- University of Southern California (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Institute on Aging (US)
- National Institute on Aging (US)
- New York Genome Center (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2026-09-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04662-6
- Primary Topic
- Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00