A quantitative framework for evaluating overburden disturbance and surface subsidence induced by coal seam mining

Abstract Coal seam mining inevitably causes varying degrees of disturbance to the overlying strata and surface environment, necessitating the establishment of a scientific and systematic quantitative assessment framework for overburden disturbance. This study introduces a comprehensive methodology for assessing the impacts of mining activities on overburden strata. A theoretical model was developed to calculate the subsidence of a target rock stratum (TRS) during multi-panel mining, and an efficient computational tool was implemented using MATLAB. Key factors influencing TRS subsidence distribution were analyzed. The results indicate that mining height, loess thickness, and roof strata collapse angle positively correlate with TRS subsidence, while the distance between the coal seam and TRS, TRS thickness, and TRS elastic modulus exhibit negative correlations. Adjusting coal pillar width was shown to optimize the location of max-subsidence. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to explore the interactions among factors, revealing additive effects between positive-positive and negative-negative factors and attenuating effects between positive–negative factors. By integrating RSM, gray relational analysis, and normalization sensitivity analysis, the relative importance of influencing factors was quantified. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was employed to establish a quantitative model for evaluating overburden disturbance. A disturbance index ( φ ) was introduced as a metric, with a threshold ( φ > 3.0) defined to identify significant surface deformation. The reliability of the proposed model was validated using geological borehole data and GNSS-measured surface subsidence from the No. 6105 panel of the Hongshuliang Coal Mine, achieving high predictive accuracy with an average absolute error of less than 0.085 after normalization. The analysis treated the uppermost bedrock in the study area as the TRS and provided a robust evaluation of post-mining surface disturbance. This study delivers a generalized assessment framework for predicting surface subsidence, and supporting the preliminary assessment of ascending mining feasibility and aquifer disturbance. The proposed system offers valuable insights for optimizing mining plans, managing mine-induced pressure, and protecting surface ecosystems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Coal Science & Technology
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-026-00923-4
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A quantitative framework for evaluating overburden disturbance and surface subsidence induced by coal seam mining

Xinghai Lei, Tiezheng Li, Gustavo André Paneiro, Yihang Li et al.
International Journal of Coal Science & Technology
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

A quantitative framework for evaluating overburden disturbance and surface subsidence induced by coal seam mining

Xinghai Lei, Tiezheng Li, Gustavo André Paneiro, Yihang Li, Nan Wang, Yang Li, Yuliang Wang, Jinlong Cao, Haotian Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Coal seam mining inevitably causes varying degrees of disturbance to the overlying strata and surface environment, necessitating the establishment of a scientific and systematic quantitative assessment framework for overburden disturbance. This study introduces a comprehensive methodology for assessing the impacts of mining activities on overburden strata. A theoretical model was developed to calculate the subsidence of a target rock stratum (TRS) during multi-panel mining, and an efficient computational tool was implemented using MATLAB. Key factors influencing TRS subsidence distribution were analyzed. The results indicate that mining height, loess thickness, and roof strata collapse angle positively correlate with TRS subsidence, while the distance between the coal seam and TRS, TRS thickness, and TRS elastic modulus exhibit negative correlations. Adjusting coal pillar width was shown to optimize the location of max-subsidence. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to explore the interactions among factors, revealing additive effects between positive-positive and negative-negative factors and attenuating effects between positive–negative factors. By integrating RSM, gray relational analysis, and normalization sensitivity analysis, the relative importance of influencing factors was quantified. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was employed to establish a quantitative model for evaluating overburden disturbance. A disturbance index ( φ ) was introduced as a metric, with a threshold ( φ > 3.0) defined to identify significant surface deformation. The reliability of the proposed model was validated using geological borehole data and GNSS-measured surface subsidence from the No. 6105 panel of the Hongshuliang Coal Mine, achieving high predictive accuracy with an average absolute error of less than 0.085 after normalization. The analysis treated the uppermost bedrock in the study area as the TRS and provided a robust evaluation of post-mining surface disturbance. This study delivers a generalized assessment framework for predicting surface subsidence, and supporting the preliminary assessment of ascending mining feasibility and aquifer disturbance. The proposed system offers valuable insights for optimizing mining plans, managing mine-induced pressure, and protecting surface ecosystems.

International Journal of Coal Science & TechnologyVol. 13(1)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.