Between standards and practice: a cross-sectional comparative study of self-assessed nursing professional competence in Poland and Lithuania using interaction-based regression

The growing complexity of healthcare and expanding nursing roles require systematic assessment of professional competence across different healthcare contexts. This study aimed to assess self-reported nursing professional competence among participating nurses from Poland and Lithuania and to examine whether associations between demographic, educational, and workplace-related characteristics and self-assessed competence differed between the two country samples. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 851 professionally active nurses from Poland and Lithuania. Data were collected online using the Nurse Professional Competence Scale-Short Form (NPC-SF) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, between-country analyses, adjusted linear regression models, and interaction-based regression analyses were applied. Nurses reported high self-assessed competence scores in direct nursing care and value-based practice, whereas the lowest scores were observed in Development, Leadership and Organization of Nursing Care and Medical and Technical Care. In unadjusted analyses, participants in the Polish sample scored higher in Nursing Care, whereas participants in the Lithuanian sample scored higher in Medical and Technical Care and Development, Leadership and Organization of Nursing Care. After adjustment for age, professional experience, workplace, education, and additional professional development, country remained significantly associated with five of six NPC-SF domains, but not with Nursing Care. Higher education was positively associated with NPC-SF scores in several domains. Associations of sex, age, education, workplace, and professional development with NPC-SF scores differed between the two country samples. Self-assessed competence profiles differed between the Polish and Lithuanian samples and were associated with individual and professional characteristics. Broader educational, professional, and organizational contexts may help explain these patterns; however, the observed associations do not demonstrate direct effects of national systems. Given the non-probability sampling strategy, the findings should be interpreted as sample-based comparative evidence on self-assessed competence among participating nurses. These findings support context-sensitive approaches to competence development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10352-1
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Between standards and practice: a cross-sectional comparative study of self-assessed nursing professional competence in Poland and Lithuania using interaction-based regression

Asta Mažionienė, Nijolė Galdikienė, Aurelija Blaževičienė, Artur Stolarczyk et al.
BMC Medical Education
Nursing education and management
article

Between standards and practice: a cross-sectional comparative study of self-assessed nursing professional competence in Poland and Lithuania using interaction-based regression

Asta Mažionienė, Nijolė Galdikienė, Aurelija Blaževičienė, Artur Stolarczyk, Olga Adamska, Anna Bartosiewicz, Łukasz Oleksy
article en

Abstract

The growing complexity of healthcare and expanding nursing roles require systematic assessment of professional competence across different healthcare contexts. This study aimed to assess self-reported nursing professional competence among participating nurses from Poland and Lithuania and to examine whether associations between demographic, educational, and workplace-related characteristics and self-assessed competence differed between the two country samples. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 851 professionally active nurses from Poland and Lithuania. Data were collected online using the Nurse Professional Competence Scale-Short Form (NPC-SF) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, between-country analyses, adjusted linear regression models, and interaction-based regression analyses were applied. Nurses reported high self-assessed competence scores in direct nursing care and value-based practice, whereas the lowest scores were observed in Development, Leadership and Organization of Nursing Care and Medical and Technical Care. In unadjusted analyses, participants in the Polish sample scored higher in Nursing Care, whereas participants in the Lithuanian sample scored higher in Medical and Technical Care and Development, Leadership and Organization of Nursing Care. After adjustment for age, professional experience, workplace, education, and additional professional development, country remained significantly associated with five of six NPC-SF domains, but not with Nursing Care. Higher education was positively associated with NPC-SF scores in several domains. Associations of sex, age, education, workplace, and professional development with NPC-SF scores differed between the two country samples. Self-assessed competence profiles differed between the Polish and Lithuanian samples and were associated with individual and professional characteristics. Broader educational, professional, and organizational contexts may help explain these patterns; however, the observed associations do not demonstrate direct effects of national systems. Given the non-probability sampling strategy, the findings should be interpreted as sample-based comparative evidence on self-assessed competence among participating nurses. These findings support context-sensitive approaches to competence development.

BMC Medical Education
University of Szczecin (PL), Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), Klaipėdos valstybinė kolegija / Higher Education Institution (LT), Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw (PL), University of Rzeszów (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.