Bridging the divide between health economics and outcomes research and biomedical investment: reflections from a health economist working in venture capital

Despite investors' pivotal role in shaping biomedical innovation, interaction between the investment community and health economics and outcomes research professionals remains limited. Both communities seek to understand what society values and how to allocate resources accordingly, yet these conversations occur largely in parallel. This perspective article, written from the viewpoint of a health economist who joined a major biomedical investment firm, seeks to bridge that divide. Drawing on first-hand observations across three domains - profits, incentives and societal value; coverage, pricing and patient access; and public policy and innovation - it argues that health economics and outcomes research must reconnect with its economic foundations, incorporate insights from real-world investment practice, and update its methods to better inform policy, promote innovation and improve patient welfare in a market-based system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2026-0087
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Bridging the divide between health economics and outcomes research and biomedical investment: reflections from a health economist working in venture capital

Richard Xie
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Bridging the divide between health economics and outcomes research and biomedical investment: reflections from a health economist working in venture capital

Richard Xie
article en

Abstract

Despite investors' pivotal role in shaping biomedical innovation, interaction between the investment community and health economics and outcomes research professionals remains limited. Both communities seek to understand what society values and how to allocate resources accordingly, yet these conversations occur largely in parallel. This perspective article, written from the viewpoint of a health economist who joined a major biomedical investment firm, seeks to bridge that divide. Drawing on first-hand observations across three domains - profits, incentives and societal value; coverage, pricing and patient access; and public policy and innovation - it argues that health economics and outcomes research must reconnect with its economic foundations, incorporate insights from real-world investment practice, and update its methods to better inform policy, promote innovation and improve patient welfare in a market-based system.

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Management Sciences for Health (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.