Food hypersensitivity communication across physical and online foodservice menus in Brazil: fragmented regulation and consumer experiences in a mixed-methods study

Inadequate communication of food hypersensitivity in foodservice settings is a recognised risk to consumer safety, yet in Brazil no national regulation governs disclosure in non-prepackaged foods. This study characterises how food hypersensitivity is communicated through physical and online foodservice menus across Brazilian cities, and whether communication differs by the presence of local legislation. A convergent mixed-methods study assessed food hypersensitivity communication in 1,034 menus (323 physical; 711 online) from 18 Brazilian cities (seven with specific legislation, 11 comparators). Menus were classified by format: no information; ingredient-only; emphasised (typographic highlighting); or symbol/code-based (icons, codes or matrices). Four focus groups with 18 participants explored experiences of adults with food allergy, intolerance or coeliac disease, and parents of children with food allergy or coeliac disease. Most menus provided some information, predominantly ingredient-only (physical: 76.2%; online: 88.0%); few provided none (6.5%; 1.0%). Warning messages were uncommon (physical: 11.1%; online: 0.1%). Explicit food hypersensitivity information was more frequent in regulated than unregulated physical menus (regulated: 24.5%; unregulated: 12.7%; p < 0.001). Higher average customer expenditure predicted explicit information (OR = 3.46), and the effect of local regulation depended on establishment type (interaction p < 0.001). Regulation was associated with explicit information among independent establishments (OR = 8.29) but not among chains (OR = 0.55), which provided it at comparable levels regardless of regulatory context. No regulatory effect was observed online, where local laws rarely apply. Consumers valued clear, visually salient formats — icons and complete ingredient descriptions — and identified hidden hypersensitivity-relevant ingredients in composite dishes and inconsistent staff guidance as key barriers, particularly on delivery platforms. This is the first assessment of food hypersensitivity communication in Brazilian foodservice, showing that subnational regulation is associated with more explicit physical-menu communication among independent establishments. Establishments require structured communication and staff training; delivery platforms need mandatory disclosure fields and standardised warnings; policymakers should prioritise structured allergen fields on delivery platforms, with a national framework as a longer-term objective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Control
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2026.112628
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Food hypersensitivity communication across physical and online foodservice menus in Brazil: fragmented regulation and consumer experiences in a mixed-methods study

Diogo Thimóteo da Cunha, Caroline Opolski Medeiros, Priscilla Moura Rolim, Jan Mei Soon et al.
Food Control
Food Safety and Hygiene
article

Food hypersensitivity communication across physical and online foodservice menus in Brazil: fragmented regulation and consumer experiences in a mixed-methods study

Diogo Thimóteo da Cunha, Caroline Opolski Medeiros, Priscilla Moura Rolim, Jan Mei Soon, Tatiana Evangelista da Silva Rocha, Fabiana Magnabosco de Vargas, Elke Stedefeldt, Mariana Scudeller Vicentini, Verônica Cortez Ginani, Laís Mariano Zanin, Carolina Neves Freiria, Lisa Marie Winnall, Iain Malcolm Ferris, Mirela Nielsen Estigarribia, Giovana Boni Cardoso
article en

Abstract

Inadequate communication of food hypersensitivity in foodservice settings is a recognised risk to consumer safety, yet in Brazil no national regulation governs disclosure in non-prepackaged foods. This study characterises how food hypersensitivity is communicated through physical and online foodservice menus across Brazilian cities, and whether communication differs by the presence of local legislation. A convergent mixed-methods study assessed food hypersensitivity communication in 1,034 menus (323 physical; 711 online) from 18 Brazilian cities (seven with specific legislation, 11 comparators). Menus were classified by format: no information; ingredient-only; emphasised (typographic highlighting); or symbol/code-based (icons, codes or matrices). Four focus groups with 18 participants explored experiences of adults with food allergy, intolerance or coeliac disease, and parents of children with food allergy or coeliac disease. Most menus provided some information, predominantly ingredient-only (physical: 76.2%; online: 88.0%); few provided none (6.5%; 1.0%). Warning messages were uncommon (physical: 11.1%; online: 0.1%). Explicit food hypersensitivity information was more frequent in regulated than unregulated physical menus (regulated: 24.5%; unregulated: 12.7%; p < 0.001). Higher average customer expenditure predicted explicit information (OR = 3.46), and the effect of local regulation depended on establishment type (interaction p < 0.001). Regulation was associated with explicit information among independent establishments (OR = 8.29) but not among chains (OR = 0.55), which provided it at comparable levels regardless of regulatory context. No regulatory effect was observed online, where local laws rarely apply. Consumers valued clear, visually salient formats — icons and complete ingredient descriptions — and identified hidden hypersensitivity-relevant ingredients in composite dishes and inconsistent staff guidance as key barriers, particularly on delivery platforms. This is the first assessment of food hypersensitivity communication in Brazilian foodservice, showing that subnational regulation is associated with more explicit physical-menu communication among independent establishments. Establishments require structured communication and staff training; delivery platforms need mandatory disclosure fields and standardised warnings; policymakers should prioritise structured allergen fields on delivery platforms, with a national framework as a longer-term objective.

Food ControlVol. 193
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade de Brasília (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), University of Lancashire (GB), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR), Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR), University of Birmingham (GB), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Food Safety and Hygiene
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.