Research on Dynamic Planning of a Modular Cabin Assembly Sequence for Large Cruise Ships Based on an Improved Genetic Algorithm

Assembly sequence planning for prefabricated modular cabin units must satisfy geometric, precedence, stability, direction, and tool constraints while remaining responsive to workshop disturbances. This study formulates the task as a constrained, scalarized multi-criteria optimization problem, and combines constraint-aware greedy screening, blockwise split-and-recombination operators, and a feasibility-guided population injection in an improved genetic algorithm (IGA). The fair computational study used identical population sizes, evaluation budgets, stopping rules, crossover probabilities, and mutation probabilities for GA and IGA, with 30 independent runs on a reconstructed, anonymized 15-component benchmark derived from the component attributes and sequences reported in the submitted manuscript. IGA reached the best-known fitness of 0.115741 in 30/30 runs and required a mean of 10.6 generations to reach that value, whereas GA reached it in 26/30 runs and required 124.8 generations among successful runs. Simulated annealing and ant colony optimization reached the same best-known value, so global optimality is not claimed for the 15-component benchmark; exhaustive enumeration only verifies the optimum of a reduced nine-component instance. Ablation, diversity, parameter sensitivity, and synthetic 30–60-component tests clarify the contributions and limits of each mechanism. The event-triggered dynamic planning layer was additionally evaluated for six disturbance types and completed replanning in 0.52–0.62 s, reducing normalized waiting times by 33.3–100% in the release-delay scenarios. The results support feasibility and rapid replanning for this computational benchmark, while validation on complete shipyard matrices and measured task-time data remains necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14181713
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Research on Dynamic Planning of a Modular Cabin Assembly Sequence for Large Cruise Ships Based on an Improved Genetic Algorithm

Xin Wan, Bai-Qiao Chen, Weijian Qiu, Mingxia Zhu et al.
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

Research on Dynamic Planning of a Modular Cabin Assembly Sequence for Large Cruise Ships Based on an Improved Genetic Algorithm

Xin Wan, Bai-Qiao Chen, Weijian Qiu, Mingxia Zhu, Li Li
article en

Abstract

Assembly sequence planning for prefabricated modular cabin units must satisfy geometric, precedence, stability, direction, and tool constraints while remaining responsive to workshop disturbances. This study formulates the task as a constrained, scalarized multi-criteria optimization problem, and combines constraint-aware greedy screening, blockwise split-and-recombination operators, and a feasibility-guided population injection in an improved genetic algorithm (IGA). The fair computational study used identical population sizes, evaluation budgets, stopping rules, crossover probabilities, and mutation probabilities for GA and IGA, with 30 independent runs on a reconstructed, anonymized 15-component benchmark derived from the component attributes and sequences reported in the submitted manuscript. IGA reached the best-known fitness of 0.115741 in 30/30 runs and required a mean of 10.6 generations to reach that value, whereas GA reached it in 26/30 runs and required 124.8 generations among successful runs. Simulated annealing and ant colony optimization reached the same best-known value, so global optimality is not claimed for the 15-component benchmark; exhaustive enumeration only verifies the optimum of a reduced nine-component instance. Ablation, diversity, parameter sensitivity, and synthetic 30–60-component tests clarify the contributions and limits of each mechanism. The event-triggered dynamic planning layer was additionally evaluated for six disturbance types and completed replanning in 0.52–0.62 s, reducing normalized waiting times by 33.3–100% in the release-delay scenarios. The results support feasibility and rapid replanning for this computational benchmark, while validation on complete shipyard matrices and measured task-time data remains necessary.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 14(18)
University of Lisbon (PT), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (CN), Wuhan Ship Development & Design Institute (CN), China Ocean Shipping (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.