Cross-disciplinary “General Learning Objectives” for postgraduate medical training: Prioritisation of five competency domains using a Delphi process

Objective: The Swiss postgraduate education regulations stipulate that teaching be guided by cross-disciplinary “General Learning Objectives” (GLOs) based on the CanMEDS roles. Notwithstanding these regulations, teaching activities and performance criteria for GLOs are scarcely evident in postgraduate training programmes. The primary aim of this study was to determine the reasons why too little emphasis is placed on GLOs in postgraduate training programmes. A secondary aim was to define a reduced set of needs-based cross-disciplinary competencies that trainees should develop during their postgraduate medical training. Methodology: A Delphi study was conducted to survey postgraduate trainees and heads of training centres throughout Switzerland. In two rounds of surveys, data were collected on (1) why too little emphasis is placed on GLOs in postgraduate training and (2) which GLOs are considered relevant. Based on these results, the GLOs were then consolidated into competency domains. Results: The main reason for the underemphasis on GLOs was the high workload of postgraduate trainees. Based on the data from both survey rounds, the following five competency domains were formulated and prioritised by the research team: “patient safety”, “communication in physician-patient relationships”, “mental health of physicians”, “collaboration in interprofessional teams” and “clinical ethics”. Conclusions: The results of the Delphi study confirm the need for action and provide important insights into how sub-aspects of GLOs are weighted by clinicians. Barriers to implementation of GLOs include the high workload imposed on postgraduate trainees and the lack of awareness about GLOs. The final concept comprised five cross-disciplinary competency domains that provide an application-oriented framework to underpin postgraduate medical training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GMS journal for medical education
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001875
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cross-disciplinary “General Learning Objectives” for postgraduate medical training: Prioritisation of five competency domains using a Delphi process

Monika Brodmann Maeder, Elke Bayha, Eva Kathrin Hennel, Giatgen A. Spinas et al.
GMS journal for medical education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Cross-disciplinary “General Learning Objectives” for postgraduate medical training: Prioritisation of five competency domains using a Delphi process

Monika Brodmann Maeder, Elke Bayha, Eva Kathrin Hennel, Giatgen A. Spinas, Hermann Armstad
article en

Abstract

Objective: The Swiss postgraduate education regulations stipulate that teaching be guided by cross-disciplinary “General Learning Objectives” (GLOs) based on the CanMEDS roles. Notwithstanding these regulations, teaching activities and performance criteria for GLOs are scarcely evident in postgraduate training programmes. The primary aim of this study was to determine the reasons why too little emphasis is placed on GLOs in postgraduate training programmes. A secondary aim was to define a reduced set of needs-based cross-disciplinary competencies that trainees should develop during their postgraduate medical training. Methodology: A Delphi study was conducted to survey postgraduate trainees and heads of training centres throughout Switzerland. In two rounds of surveys, data were collected on (1) why too little emphasis is placed on GLOs in postgraduate training and (2) which GLOs are considered relevant. Based on these results, the GLOs were then consolidated into competency domains. Results: The main reason for the underemphasis on GLOs was the high workload of postgraduate trainees. Based on the data from both survey rounds, the following five competency domains were formulated and prioritised by the research team: “patient safety”, “communication in physician-patient relationships”, “mental health of physicians”, “collaboration in interprofessional teams” and “clinical ethics”. Conclusions: The results of the Delphi study confirm the need for action and provide important insights into how sub-aspects of GLOs are weighted by clinicians. Barriers to implementation of GLOs include the high workload imposed on postgraduate trainees and the lack of awareness about GLOs. The final concept comprised five cross-disciplinary competency domains that provide an application-oriented framework to underpin postgraduate medical training.

GMS journal for medical education
University of Bern (CH), Department of Biomedicine Basel (CH), Swiss Institute of Comparative Law (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.