“Justifying Military Conscription”

ABSTRACT I argue that wartime military conscription can be justified only if potential conscripts have duties to enlist, or duties to participate in an enlistment lottery, that conscription forces them to discharge. I explore whether our interpersonal duties to rescue can ground a duty to enlist. I reject the claim that our duties to rescue can only permit, not require, us to kill. I then argue that whether the risks of military enlistment exceed what can be demanded by an ordinary duty to rescue partly depends on how we ought to define and calculate rescue costs. I defend a broad definition of rescue costs and contrast ex ante and ex post approaches to calculating rescue costs. I then consider three possible bases of an extraordinary duty of rescue that might ground a duty to enlist. We might have secondary duties to incur ordinarily supererogatory rescue costs. We might have duties to avert moral catastrophes at ordinarily supererogatory cost. And we might have duties to avoid freeriding that can ground extraordinary duties of rescue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Perspectives
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.70007
Primary Topic
War, Ethics, and Justification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

“Justifying Military Conscription”

Helen Frowe
Philosophical Perspectives
War, Ethics, and Justification
article

“Justifying Military Conscription”

Helen Frowe
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT I argue that wartime military conscription can be justified only if potential conscripts have duties to enlist, or duties to participate in an enlistment lottery, that conscription forces them to discharge. I explore whether our interpersonal duties to rescue can ground a duty to enlist. I reject the claim that our duties to rescue can only permit, not require, us to kill. I then argue that whether the risks of military enlistment exceed what can be demanded by an ordinary duty to rescue partly depends on how we ought to define and calculate rescue costs. I defend a broad definition of rescue costs and contrast ex ante and ex post approaches to calculating rescue costs. I then consider three possible bases of an extraordinary duty of rescue that might ground a duty to enlist. We might have secondary duties to incur ordinarily supererogatory rescue costs. We might have duties to avert moral catastrophes at ordinarily supererogatory cost. And we might have duties to avoid freeriding that can ground extraordinary duties of rescue.

Philosophical Perspectives
Stockholm University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
War, Ethics, and Justification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Justifying Military Conscription” — Helen Frowe · Philosophical Perspectives (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS