Promising Patient‐Engagement Practices Used by National Research Networks at the US Veterans Health Administration: Perspectives of Veterans, Staff, and Research Leaders

ABSTRACT Introduction Active involvement of patients is an essential feature of learning health systems and patient‐centered research. Research networks and healthcare organizations lack guidance on best practices for developing and sustaining patient engagement infrastructure. We sought to examine perspectives on promising Veteran‐engagement infrastructure and practices used by US Veterans Affairs (VA) research networks. Methods We solicited expert opinion from three separate panels of Veterans, VA engagement staff, and VA research leaders using a modified Delphi process comprising two rounds of online surveys and a set of virtual group meetings or individual interviews. In a prior study, we identified promising engagement practices in use by VA national research networks. We analyzed survey data with predefined rating categories to determine which practices the three expert panels consistently endorsed. We used thematic analysis to compare experts' perspectives across panels and to identify emergent cross‐cutting themes. Results Veterans, VA engagement staff, and VA research leaders consistently endorsed 66% (29/44) of the research networks' promising Veteran‐engagement practices. Summarized, these practices formed five recommended engagement‐related responsibilities for VA research networks. Some network engagement practices were inconsistently endorsed (13/44, 30%), and two practices (4%) received overall ratings of neutral or unsure by at least one expert panel. Network practices not consistently endorsed varied by expert panel, but panelists' comments reflected three overarching themes: constraint of resource availability, commitment to respectful and meaningful engagement processes, and concern for potential burden on partners. Conclusions Panelists' perspectives highlight challenges regarding how to best invest limited patient‐engagement resources within research and learning health system organizations. Research network engagement infrastructure can help expand the capacity and culture of patient‐centered research and care. Organizations seeking to function as learning health systems need to devote planning time, skilled staff, and funds to develop and sustain patient‐engagement infrastructure tailored to their context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning Health Systems
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.70119
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Promising Patient‐Engagement Practices Used by National Research Networks at the US Veterans Health Administration: Perspectives of Veterans, Staff, and Research Leaders

Agnes Jensen, Jennifer P. Wisdom, Tracy L. Sides, Erin E. Krebs et al.
Learning Health Systems
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Promising Patient‐Engagement Practices Used by National Research Networks at the US Veterans Health Administration: Perspectives of Veterans, Staff, and Research Leaders

Agnes Jensen, Jennifer P. Wisdom, Tracy L. Sides, Erin E. Krebs, Erin C. Amundson, Laura A. Meis, Malloree M. Argust, Diana Burgess
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Active involvement of patients is an essential feature of learning health systems and patient‐centered research. Research networks and healthcare organizations lack guidance on best practices for developing and sustaining patient engagement infrastructure. We sought to examine perspectives on promising Veteran‐engagement infrastructure and practices used by US Veterans Affairs (VA) research networks. Methods We solicited expert opinion from three separate panels of Veterans, VA engagement staff, and VA research leaders using a modified Delphi process comprising two rounds of online surveys and a set of virtual group meetings or individual interviews. In a prior study, we identified promising engagement practices in use by VA national research networks. We analyzed survey data with predefined rating categories to determine which practices the three expert panels consistently endorsed. We used thematic analysis to compare experts' perspectives across panels and to identify emergent cross‐cutting themes. Results Veterans, VA engagement staff, and VA research leaders consistently endorsed 66% (29/44) of the research networks' promising Veteran‐engagement practices. Summarized, these practices formed five recommended engagement‐related responsibilities for VA research networks. Some network engagement practices were inconsistently endorsed (13/44, 30%), and two practices (4%) received overall ratings of neutral or unsure by at least one expert panel. Network practices not consistently endorsed varied by expert panel, but panelists' comments reflected three overarching themes: constraint of resource availability, commitment to respectful and meaningful engagement processes, and concern for potential burden on partners. Conclusions Panelists' perspectives highlight challenges regarding how to best invest limited patient‐engagement resources within research and learning health system organizations. Research network engagement infrastructure can help expand the capacity and culture of patient‐centered research and care. Organizations seeking to function as learning health systems need to devote planning time, skilled staff, and funds to develop and sustain patient‐engagement infrastructure tailored to their context.

Learning Health SystemsVol. 10(4)
University of Minnesota (US), National Center for PTSD (US), Wisdom Health (United States) (US), Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.