Unity of the Classical–Romantic Era?: On the Weaknesses of a Certain Paradigm in Music History

Abstract One significant proposal in the periodisation of music history was the concept of the unity of the Classical–Romantic era, presented in similar form by Zofia Lissa and Friedrich Blume in the 1960s. Both authors proposed combining musical Classicism and Romanticism— two periods previously treated separately—into one coherent period lasting almost a century and a half (c. 1770–c. 1910). Although this type of periodisation survived until the end of the twentieth century and was regarded as broadly authoritative, discussion of this approach to music history seems necessary in the twenty-first century. Extensive research into early music has shown that the fundamental traits of the Classical style were formed well before 1770. In turn, recent interpretations of the styles and trends of nineteenth-century music have led researchers to question whether it is appropriate to treat musical Romanticism as a phenomenon extending into the second half of the century. All this necessitates a re-examination of Lissa and Blume’s position, which, from a source-historical perspective, appears oversimplified and outdated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Musicology Today
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/muso-2026-0002
Primary Topic
Musicology and Musical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Unity of the Classical–Romantic Era?: On the Weaknesses of a Certain Paradigm in Music History

Ryszard Daniel Golianek
Musicology Today
Musicology and Musical Analysis
article

Unity of the Classical–Romantic Era?: On the Weaknesses of a Certain Paradigm in Music History

Ryszard Daniel Golianek
article en

Abstract

Abstract One significant proposal in the periodisation of music history was the concept of the unity of the Classical–Romantic era, presented in similar form by Zofia Lissa and Friedrich Blume in the 1960s. Both authors proposed combining musical Classicism and Romanticism— two periods previously treated separately—into one coherent period lasting almost a century and a half (c. 1770–c. 1910). Although this type of periodisation survived until the end of the twentieth century and was regarded as broadly authoritative, discussion of this approach to music history seems necessary in the twenty-first century. Extensive research into early music has shown that the fundamental traits of the Classical style were formed well before 1770. In turn, recent interpretations of the styles and trends of nineteenth-century music have led researchers to question whether it is appropriate to treat musical Romanticism as a phenomenon extending into the second half of the century. All this necessitates a re-examination of Lissa and Blume’s position, which, from a source-historical perspective, appears oversimplified and outdated.

Musicology Today
Academy of Music in Łódź (PL), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Musicology and Musical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unity of the Classical–Romantic Era?: On the Weaknesses of a Certain Paradigm in Music History — Ryszard Daniel Golianek · Musicology Today (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS