Risk Exposure and Institutional Pressure: Drivers of Environmental Disclosure in Sub‐Saharan Africa

ABSTRACT This study investigates how objective environmental and institutional pressures drive corporate environmental disclosure in sub‐Saharan Africa, independent of firms' self‐reported claims. Using 2390 firm‐year observations (2012–2021) from six countries, we proxy for carbon intensity and occupational safety risk using sector‐level benchmarks from the International Energy Agency, the International Labour Organisation and for regulatory stringency using the World Bank's policy index. Findings indicate that firms in high‐risk sectors disclose significantly more, and stronger national regulations further increase transparency, even under weak enforcement. These results refine legitimacy and institutional theories by demonstrating that disclosure responds to measurable risk exposure rather than merely symbolic reporting. We find that grounding analysis in observable risk exposures strengthens environmental accountability in emerging markets. The findings support risk‐proportionate disclosure mandates: stringent, verified reporting for high‐impact sectors and streamlined requirements for low‐risk firms, enhancing relevance without overburdening institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71582
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Risk Exposure and Institutional Pressure: Drivers of Environmental Disclosure in Sub‐Saharan Africa

James Tuffour, Marshall Wellington Blay, Vincent Adela, Bismark Ackah et al.
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Risk Exposure and Institutional Pressure: Drivers of Environmental Disclosure in Sub‐Saharan Africa

James Tuffour, Marshall Wellington Blay, Vincent Adela, Bismark Ackah, Richard Afriyie Oduro
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates how objective environmental and institutional pressures drive corporate environmental disclosure in sub‐Saharan Africa, independent of firms' self‐reported claims. Using 2390 firm‐year observations (2012–2021) from six countries, we proxy for carbon intensity and occupational safety risk using sector‐level benchmarks from the International Energy Agency, the International Labour Organisation and for regulatory stringency using the World Bank's policy index. Findings indicate that firms in high‐risk sectors disclose significantly more, and stronger national regulations further increase transparency, even under weak enforcement. These results refine legitimacy and institutional theories by demonstrating that disclosure responds to measurable risk exposure rather than merely symbolic reporting. We find that grounding analysis in observable risk exposures strengthens environmental accountability in emerging markets. The findings support risk‐proportionate disclosure mandates: stringent, verified reporting for high‐impact sectors and streamlined requirements for low‐risk firms, enhancing relevance without overburdening institutions.

Business Strategy and the Environment
University of Leeds (GB), University of Cape Coast (GH), Burman University (CA), Takoradi Technical University (GH)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.