Global recommendations for the use of diagnostic genomic sequencing in the prenatal setting on behalf of the ESHG and ISPD

Diagnostic genomic sequencing is increasingly being implemented in the prenatal setting for fetuses with structural anomalies identified by imaging. Such testing provides information for multiple purposes, i.e., guiding treatment decisions, preparation for the birth of an affected child, or termination of a pregnancy. Some national committee’s statements have been published [ 1 ]. However, to date there is only one international position statement on the use of genome-wide sequencing for prenatal diagnosis issued by the ISPD in 2022, whereby caution was recommended as to testing eligibility criteria and which findings should be reported [ 2 ]. Since then, the use of prenatal genomic sequencing has rapidly developed with more countries implementing genome sequencing rather than capture-based methods [ 3 , 4 ], due to significant improvements in detecting copy-number and structural variants and the evolution of new sequencing platforms utilizing long-read technology. Moreover, improvements in fetal imaging and earlier scans have allowed more accurate fetal phenotyping, and in combination with increased availability of genomic sequencing is evolving our understanding of the prenatal features of genetic diseases. This has created a need to update recommendations to respond to this rapidly advancing field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02217-4
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Global recommendations for the use of diagnostic genomic sequencing in the prenatal setting on behalf of the ESHG and ISPD

Kwong Wai Choy, Sabine Hentze, Raquel Gouveia Silva, Lina Basel‐Salmon et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Global recommendations for the use of diagnostic genomic sequencing in the prenatal setting on behalf of the ESHG and ISPD

Kwong Wai Choy, Sabine Hentze, Raquel Gouveia Silva, Lina Basel‐Salmon, Tina‐Marié Wessels, Paula Jorge, Luca Lovrečić, Francesca Forzano, Lilian Downie, Dora Mayen, Natalie Chandler, Francesca Romana Grati, Guido de Wert, Álvaro Mendes, Zandra C. Deans, Zirui Dong, Michael Morris, Brynn Levy, Ashley Pritchard
article en

Abstract

Diagnostic genomic sequencing is increasingly being implemented in the prenatal setting for fetuses with structural anomalies identified by imaging. Such testing provides information for multiple purposes, i.e., guiding treatment decisions, preparation for the birth of an affected child, or termination of a pregnancy. Some national committee’s statements have been published [ 1 ]. However, to date there is only one international position statement on the use of genome-wide sequencing for prenatal diagnosis issued by the ISPD in 2022, whereby caution was recommended as to testing eligibility criteria and which findings should be reported [ 2 ]. Since then, the use of prenatal genomic sequencing has rapidly developed with more countries implementing genome sequencing rather than capture-based methods [ 3 , 4 ], due to significant improvements in detecting copy-number and structural variants and the evolution of new sequencing platforms utilizing long-read technology. Moreover, improvements in fetal imaging and earlier scans have allowed more accurate fetal phenotyping, and in combination with increased availability of genomic sequencing is evolving our understanding of the prenatal features of genetic diseases. This has created a need to update recommendations to respond to this rapidly advancing field.

European Journal of Human Genetics
Synlab Czech (Czechia) (CZ), Roche (United States) (US), NHS Lothian (GB), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), University of Lisbon (PT), University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Cape Town (ZA), Tel Aviv University (IL), The University of Melbourne (AU), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Universidade do Porto (PT), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Ljubljana University Medical Centre (SI), Maccabi Healthcare Services (IL), Maastricht University (NL), Castellini (Italy) (IT), Victorian Clinical Genetics Services (AU), Synlab (Germany) (DE), Instituto de Salud del Estado de México (MX), Hospital de Santa Maria (PT), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT), Maccabi Institute for Health Services Research (IL), University of Coimbra (PT)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Tel Aviv University
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.