Between disconnection and connection: The paradoxes of Cold War export controls

Abstract This article reinterprets Cold War multilateral export controls not simply as mechanisms restricting access to strategic technologies, but as sites of mediated connection within Cold War globalisation. Moving beyond a US-centred framework, it examines West Germany’s experience of the China embargo under ChinCom in the 1950s and the liberalisation of controls in respect of China within CoCom in the 1980s. It asks how regimes designed to enforce technological disconnection generated new forms of global connectivity, arguing that this transformation can be understood through Western alliance asymmetries and CoCom’s role as an institutionalised site of transit. In the 1950s, embargo enforcement produced alternative re-export routes and unintended transnational connections. In the 1980s, competitive alliance manoeuvring revealed CoCom’s regulatory architecture as a space of negotiation where technological circulation was enabled, delayed, redirected, or politically obscured. A case study of Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm illustrates how these dynamics operated in practice. By tracing mediated technological circulation across different phases of controls in respect of China, the article reframes Cold War globalisation as shaped by dis:connectivity: the mutually constitutive interplay of connection and disconnection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global History
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1740022826100680
Primary Topic
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Between disconnection and connection: The paradoxes of Cold War export controls

Lili Li
Journal of Global History
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
article

Between disconnection and connection: The paradoxes of Cold War export controls

Lili Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article reinterprets Cold War multilateral export controls not simply as mechanisms restricting access to strategic technologies, but as sites of mediated connection within Cold War globalisation. Moving beyond a US-centred framework, it examines West Germany’s experience of the China embargo under ChinCom in the 1950s and the liberalisation of controls in respect of China within CoCom in the 1980s. It asks how regimes designed to enforce technological disconnection generated new forms of global connectivity, arguing that this transformation can be understood through Western alliance asymmetries and CoCom’s role as an institutionalised site of transit. In the 1950s, embargo enforcement produced alternative re-export routes and unintended transnational connections. In the 1980s, competitive alliance manoeuvring revealed CoCom’s regulatory architecture as a space of negotiation where technological circulation was enabled, delayed, redirected, or politically obscured. A case study of Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm illustrates how these dynamics operated in practice. By tracing mediated technological circulation across different phases of controls in respect of China, the article reframes Cold War globalisation as shaped by dis:connectivity: the mutually constitutive interplay of connection and disconnection.

Journal of Global History
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between disconnection and connection: The paradoxes of Cold War export controls — Lili Li · Journal of Global History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS