Conformalized graph neural networks for distribution system state estimation with finite-sample-valid uncertainty quantification

Distribution system state estimation provides the network-wide voltage awareness required to operate active feeders, yet scarce real-time metering forces reliance on uncertain pseudo-measurements. This paper studies how to attach empirically auditable, finite-sample prediction intervals to learned network-wide voltage estimates. A graph attention network (GAT) maps measurement-derived node features to point estimates and conditional quantiles, and conformalized quantile regression is calibrated separately for every fixed bus and output coordinate across held-out snapshots. At 20% measurement density on the IEEE 33-bus and 69-bus feeders, voltage-magnitude coverage is 0.901 and 0.903 against nominal 0.90, with angle coverage 0.896 and 0.904. The revision broadens the benchmark to matched quantile GBT, quantile MLP, MC-dropout Bayesian, and two-stage MFBNN-style baselines; architecture, calibration-size, temporal-split, simultaneous-coverage, meter-placement, topology-transfer, physics-consistency, missing-meter, and contamination-mismatch tests; and robust WLS. These tests materially narrow the claim: GBT and MLP are stronger fixed-topology backbones, learned attention is diffuse and seed-sensitive, and marginal intervals do not imply simultaneous network coverage. Random mask training limits the 40% dropout coverage loss to 0.887 (33 buses) and 0.796 (69 buses), while matched recalibration reaches 0.899 and 0.846. Max-score conformal calibration raises simultaneous voltage-magnitude coverage from 0.258/0.075 to 0.901/0.902 at a width cost. The contribution is therefore a DSSE-specific integration and failure-boundary benchmark for model-agnostic, fixed-bus conformal calibration, rather than a claim that attention is universally preferable or that nominal validity survives arbitrary shift.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and AI
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2026.100901
Primary Topic
Power System Optimization and Stability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Conformalized graph neural networks for distribution system state estimation with finite-sample-valid uncertainty quantification

Siqiang Zhao, Fengxiang Zhang
Energy and AI
Power System Optimization and Stability
article

Conformalized graph neural networks for distribution system state estimation with finite-sample-valid uncertainty quantification

Siqiang Zhao, Fengxiang Zhang
article en

Abstract

Distribution system state estimation provides the network-wide voltage awareness required to operate active feeders, yet scarce real-time metering forces reliance on uncertain pseudo-measurements. This paper studies how to attach empirically auditable, finite-sample prediction intervals to learned network-wide voltage estimates. A graph attention network (GAT) maps measurement-derived node features to point estimates and conditional quantiles, and conformalized quantile regression is calibrated separately for every fixed bus and output coordinate across held-out snapshots. At 20% measurement density on the IEEE 33-bus and 69-bus feeders, voltage-magnitude coverage is 0.901 and 0.903 against nominal 0.90, with angle coverage 0.896 and 0.904. The revision broadens the benchmark to matched quantile GBT, quantile MLP, MC-dropout Bayesian, and two-stage MFBNN-style baselines; architecture, calibration-size, temporal-split, simultaneous-coverage, meter-placement, topology-transfer, physics-consistency, missing-meter, and contamination-mismatch tests; and robust WLS. These tests materially narrow the claim: GBT and MLP are stronger fixed-topology backbones, learned attention is diffuse and seed-sensitive, and marginal intervals do not imply simultaneous network coverage. Random mask training limits the 40% dropout coverage loss to 0.887 (33 buses) and 0.796 (69 buses), while matched recalibration reaches 0.899 and 0.846. Max-score conformal calibration raises simultaneous voltage-magnitude coverage from 0.258/0.075 to 0.901/0.902 at a width cost. The contribution is therefore a DSSE-specific integration and failure-boundary benchmark for model-agnostic, fixed-bus conformal calibration, rather than a claim that attention is universally preferable or that nominal validity survives arbitrary shift.

Energy and AIVol. 26
Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse (FR), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Power System Optimization and Stability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conformalized graph neural networks for distribution system state estimation with finite-sample-valid uncertainty quantification — Siqiang Zhao, Fengxiang Zhang · Energy and AI (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS