Selective Lithium Recovery from Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries Used in Solar Energy Storage

The growing adoption of lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4, LFP) batteries in renewable energy storage systems is expected to generate substantial volumes of end-of-life batteries, presenting both waste-management challenges and opportunities for critical-mineral recovery. Although lithium recovery from spent LFP batteries has been widely investigated, many hydrometallurgical processes employ strong inorganic acids, external heating, and finely ground feed material. Comparatively few studies have specifically examined selective lithium recovery from end-of-life LFP batteries used in stationary solar-energy-storage systems. This study investigated the selective recovery of lithium from spent solar-energy-storage LFP batteries using an acetic acid–hydrogen peroxide leaching system. Cathode active material (CAM) recovered from spent batteries was characterized and subjected to scouting and OFAT optimization experiments. The optimized conditions comprised 100% stoichiometric acetic acid addition, 275% stoichiometric H2O2 addition, an initial ambient temperature, a pulp density of 20% (w/w) solids, a residence time of 1 h, and unmilled CAM with 85% (w/w) passing 850 µm. Three independent confirmatory experiments achieved mean leaching efficiencies of 95.382 ± 0.109% for Li, 0.089 ± 0.008% for Fe, and 0.009 ± 0.002% for P. XRD analysis identified heterosite (FePO4) as the dominant crystalline phase in the residue, with semi-quantitative analysis indicating an approximate phase proportion of 96%, supporting the selective delithiation of the LFP structure. The process produced a lithium-rich leachate and an FePO4-rich residue under mild operating conditions without external heating or additional grinding. These findings demonstrate the potential of the acetic–H2O2 system for the selective hydrometallurgical recovery of lithium from spent LFP batteries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Batteries
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries12090367
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Selective Lithium Recovery from Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries Used in Solar Energy Storage

James Mulwanda, V. Bazhko, Munyadziwa Mercy Ramakokovhu, Ndivhuwo Nyambeni
Batteries
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Selective Lithium Recovery from Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries Used in Solar Energy Storage

James Mulwanda, V. Bazhko, Munyadziwa Mercy Ramakokovhu, Ndivhuwo Nyambeni
article en

Abstract

The growing adoption of lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4, LFP) batteries in renewable energy storage systems is expected to generate substantial volumes of end-of-life batteries, presenting both waste-management challenges and opportunities for critical-mineral recovery. Although lithium recovery from spent LFP batteries has been widely investigated, many hydrometallurgical processes employ strong inorganic acids, external heating, and finely ground feed material. Comparatively few studies have specifically examined selective lithium recovery from end-of-life LFP batteries used in stationary solar-energy-storage systems. This study investigated the selective recovery of lithium from spent solar-energy-storage LFP batteries using an acetic acid–hydrogen peroxide leaching system. Cathode active material (CAM) recovered from spent batteries was characterized and subjected to scouting and OFAT optimization experiments. The optimized conditions comprised 100% stoichiometric acetic acid addition, 275% stoichiometric H2O2 addition, an initial ambient temperature, a pulp density of 20% (w/w) solids, a residence time of 1 h, and unmilled CAM with 85% (w/w) passing 850 µm. Three independent confirmatory experiments achieved mean leaching efficiencies of 95.382 ± 0.109% for Li, 0.089 ± 0.008% for Fe, and 0.009 ± 0.002% for P. XRD analysis identified heterosite (FePO4) as the dominant crystalline phase in the residue, with semi-quantitative analysis indicating an approximate phase proportion of 96%, supporting the selective delithiation of the LFP structure. The process produced a lithium-rich leachate and an FePO4-rich residue under mild operating conditions without external heating or additional grinding. These findings demonstrate the potential of the acetic–H2O2 system for the selective hydrometallurgical recovery of lithium from spent LFP batteries.

BatteriesVol. 12(9)
Tshwane University of Technology (ZA), Mintek (ZA), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Copperbelt University (ZM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.