Development and preliminary verification of a nutritional risk screening scale for pregnant and postpartum women in China: a Delphi-based single-center methodological study

Objective: Nutritional imbalances during pregnancy and the postpartum period are associated with adverse short- and long-term maternal and offspring outcomes. Nutritional risk screening scales specifically designed for Chinese pregnant and postpartum women are still lacking. This study aimed to develop and preliminarily verify a nutritional risk screening scale tailored to Chinese pregnant and postpartum women. Methods: Building on the framework of the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, we developed a screening instrument incorporating a maternal-fetal perspective. Candidate items were generated through a literature review, followed by iterative refinement via pilot testing and three rounds of Delphi consultation. This single-center methodological study was conducted in 2025 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai. A cohort of 2,200 participants enrolled between February and April 2025 was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. Subsequently, an independent validation cohort of 3,850 participants recruited from May to August 2025 was used to evaluate the finalized scale's predictive performance. Results: The finalized scale consisted of three first-level domains and 14 second-level items. Delphi expert response rates were 91.7%, 93.9%, and 96.8%; the final authority coefficient was 0.95, and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance increased to 0.735 (all P < 0.05). A score of 3 was identified as the optimal cutoff (AUC = 0.901, 95% CI: 0.853–0.949; sensitivity = 85.0%, specificity = 92.2%). The scale demonstrated good feasibility (valid screening rate, 98.9%; mean completion time, 2.5 ± 1.1 min), good inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.795, 95% CI: 0.743–0.847, P < 0.001), and acceptable preliminary criterion-related validity against neonatal birth weight classification as an external clinical criterion (kappa = 0.703, 95% CI: 0.669–0.737, P < 0.001). Women at nutritional risk had higher rates of abnormal neonatal birth weight and longer hospitalization. Conclusions: This new scale demonstrated good feasibility, reliability, and validity in identifying nutritional risk among Chinese pregnant and postpartum women. However, its performance has been evaluated only preliminarily at a single tertiary obstetric hospital. Multicenter validation is needed before broad clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reproductive and Developmental Medicine
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/rd9.0000000000000194
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Development and preliminary verification of a nutritional risk screening scale for pregnant and postpartum women in China: a Delphi-based single-center methodological study

Congjian Xu, Qing-Qing Cai, Fei-Fei Zhang, Xiao-Lan Xi et al.
Reproductive and Developmental Medicine
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Development and preliminary verification of a nutritional risk screening scale for pregnant and postpartum women in China: a Delphi-based single-center methodological study

Congjian Xu, Qing-Qing Cai, Fei-Fei Zhang, Xiao-Lan Xi, Pan-Pan Guo, Li Li, Yu-Xiao Wang
article en

Abstract

Objective: Nutritional imbalances during pregnancy and the postpartum period are associated with adverse short- and long-term maternal and offspring outcomes. Nutritional risk screening scales specifically designed for Chinese pregnant and postpartum women are still lacking. This study aimed to develop and preliminarily verify a nutritional risk screening scale tailored to Chinese pregnant and postpartum women. Methods: Building on the framework of the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, we developed a screening instrument incorporating a maternal-fetal perspective. Candidate items were generated through a literature review, followed by iterative refinement via pilot testing and three rounds of Delphi consultation. This single-center methodological study was conducted in 2025 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai. A cohort of 2,200 participants enrolled between February and April 2025 was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. Subsequently, an independent validation cohort of 3,850 participants recruited from May to August 2025 was used to evaluate the finalized scale's predictive performance. Results: The finalized scale consisted of three first-level domains and 14 second-level items. Delphi expert response rates were 91.7%, 93.9%, and 96.8%; the final authority coefficient was 0.95, and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance increased to 0.735 (all P < 0.05). A score of 3 was identified as the optimal cutoff (AUC = 0.901, 95% CI: 0.853–0.949; sensitivity = 85.0%, specificity = 92.2%). The scale demonstrated good feasibility (valid screening rate, 98.9%; mean completion time, 2.5 ± 1.1 min), good inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.795, 95% CI: 0.743–0.847, P < 0.001), and acceptable preliminary criterion-related validity against neonatal birth weight classification as an external clinical criterion (kappa = 0.703, 95% CI: 0.669–0.737, P < 0.001). Women at nutritional risk had higher rates of abnormal neonatal birth weight and longer hospitalization. Conclusions: This new scale demonstrated good feasibility, reliability, and validity in identifying nutritional risk among Chinese pregnant and postpartum women. However, its performance has been evaluated only preliminarily at a single tertiary obstetric hospital. Multicenter validation is needed before broad clinical implementation.

Reproductive and Developmental Medicine
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN), Westlake University (CN), Guangzhou Development Zone Hospital (CN), Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University (CN), Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University, School of Medicine (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.