Salutogenic resource profiles and compassion fatigue among nurses: a latent profile analysis

Background Compassion fatigue is a major occupational health concern among nurses and may be influenced by the availability of personal and organizational resources. Guided by the salutogenic model, this study aimed to identify latent profiles of nurses based on sense of coherence, perceived organizational support, and mindfulness, and to examine differences in compassion fatigue across these profiles. Methods A total of 516 nurses were included in this study. Latent profile analysis was conducted using sense of coherence, perceived organizational support, and mindfulness as continuous profile indicators. Model selection was based on fit indices, entropy, profile size, parsimony, and theoretical interpretability. The Bolck–Croon–Hagenaars (BCH) method was used to compare compassion fatigue across the identified profiles while accounting for classification uncertainty. A manual BCH secondary model was further used to examine factors associated with compassion fatigue within each profile. Results A two-profile solution was retained. The low-resource profile comprised 241 nurses (46.71%) and was characterised by below-average levels of sense of coherence, perceived organisational support, and mindfulness, whereas the high-resource profile comprised 275 nurses (53.29%) and showed above-average levels across all three indicators. Compassion fatigue was significantly higher in the low-resource profile than in the high-resource profile (estimated mean ± SE; 62.83 ± 1.70 vs. 30.68 ± 1.37; p < 0.001). In the profile-specific secondary analysis, working more than four night shifts per month was associated with higher compassion fatigue within the low-resource profile (B = 8.466, SE = 3.935, p = 0.031), whereas no demographic or work-related factors were significantly associated with compassion fatigue within the high-resource profile. Conclusion Nurses exhibited two distinct salutogenic resource profiles that were associated with markedly different levels of compassion fatigue. These findings highlight the potential value of considering combined patterns of personal and organisational resources when identifying nurses with different levels of vulnerability to compassion fatigue. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate whether resource-support strategies tailored to these profiles can reduce compassion fatigue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1906172
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Salutogenic resource profiles and compassion fatigue among nurses: a latent profile analysis

Shuangshuang Zhang, Meirong He, Weizeng Lou
Frontiers in Public Health
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

Salutogenic resource profiles and compassion fatigue among nurses: a latent profile analysis

Shuangshuang Zhang, Meirong He, Weizeng Lou
article en

Abstract

Background Compassion fatigue is a major occupational health concern among nurses and may be influenced by the availability of personal and organizational resources. Guided by the salutogenic model, this study aimed to identify latent profiles of nurses based on sense of coherence, perceived organizational support, and mindfulness, and to examine differences in compassion fatigue across these profiles. Methods A total of 516 nurses were included in this study. Latent profile analysis was conducted using sense of coherence, perceived organizational support, and mindfulness as continuous profile indicators. Model selection was based on fit indices, entropy, profile size, parsimony, and theoretical interpretability. The Bolck–Croon–Hagenaars (BCH) method was used to compare compassion fatigue across the identified profiles while accounting for classification uncertainty. A manual BCH secondary model was further used to examine factors associated with compassion fatigue within each profile. Results A two-profile solution was retained. The low-resource profile comprised 241 nurses (46.71%) and was characterised by below-average levels of sense of coherence, perceived organisational support, and mindfulness, whereas the high-resource profile comprised 275 nurses (53.29%) and showed above-average levels across all three indicators. Compassion fatigue was significantly higher in the low-resource profile than in the high-resource profile (estimated mean ± SE; 62.83 ± 1.70 vs. 30.68 ± 1.37; p < 0.001). In the profile-specific secondary analysis, working more than four night shifts per month was associated with higher compassion fatigue within the low-resource profile (B = 8.466, SE = 3.935, p = 0.031), whereas no demographic or work-related factors were significantly associated with compassion fatigue within the high-resource profile. Conclusion Nurses exhibited two distinct salutogenic resource profiles that were associated with markedly different levels of compassion fatigue. These findings highlight the potential value of considering combined patterns of personal and organisational resources when identifying nurses with different levels of vulnerability to compassion fatigue. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate whether resource-support strategies tailored to these profiles can reduce compassion fatigue.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.