A Novel Ex-Vivo Snare Tip Soft Coagulation Model for Deliberate Self-Practice and Assessing Endoscopic Tip-Control Competency: The HAM-2 Study

Background and Aims: Tip-control is fundamental to advanced endoscopic procedures but lacks objective assessment tools. We aimed to (1) validate an ex-vivo snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) model (HAM-2) by assessing its ability to stratify endoscopists by experience (2) evaluate its efficacy in improving tip-control following structured training; and (3) identify baseline predictors of training-related improvement. Methods: In this prospective pilot validation study (single-centre, single-arm, pre/post design), thirteen endoscopists (1 expert, 7 fellows, 5 trainees) performed STSC along 4 standardized 3D-printed shapes on a cooked-ham model. Participants underwent pre-training assessment, two unsupervised structured self-practice sessions (8 shapes), and post-training assessment. Seven blinded raters (three independent raters per video) evaluated video recordings for their subjective impression of tip-control and determined objective metrics (number of correct and incorrect hits) using an online tool. Predictors of improvement were analysed using generalized linear mixed models. Results: 13 endoscopists performed 104 STSC procedures. At baseline, the expert outperformed fellows and trainees in subjective tip-control (95.3 vs. 59.7 vs. 56.3, p<0.001), speed (40.6 vs. 23.6 vs. 19.7 mm/min, p=0.002) and accuracy (98.1% vs. 92.7% vs. 90.6%, p=0.003). Considering the overall cohort subjective tip-control improved by 12.3 (95% CI 6.9–17.7, p<0.001), speed by 5.5mm/min (3.1–7.9, p<0.001), and hit frequency by 6.1hits/min (3.7–8.5, p<0.001) post-training. Accuracy did not improve significantly (+1.3%, p=0.085). Lower endoscopist baseline accuracy and speed independently predicted greater improvement in subjective tip-control. Conclusions: In this single-centre, single-expert pilot, the HAM-2 model stratified endoscopists by experience (exploratory) and, through self-practice on the model, yielded measurable improvements in tip control following repeated practice. HAM-2 offers a low-cost, reproducible platform for structured self-practice and task-specific performance measurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2953-6394
Primary Topic
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Novel Ex-Vivo Snare Tip Soft Coagulation Model for Deliberate Self-Practice and Assessing Endoscopic Tip-Control Competency: The HAM-2 Study

Tamás Tornai, David J. Tate, Andrea Sorge, Lobke Desomer et al.
Endoscopy International Open
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
article

A Novel Ex-Vivo Snare Tip Soft Coagulation Model for Deliberate Self-Practice and Assessing Endoscopic Tip-Control Competency: The HAM-2 Study

Tamás Tornai, David J. Tate, Andrea Sorge, Lobke Desomer, Lynn Debels, Sander Smeets, Pieter Jan Poortmans, Maria Eva Argenziano, Michele Montori
article en

Abstract

Background and Aims: Tip-control is fundamental to advanced endoscopic procedures but lacks objective assessment tools. We aimed to (1) validate an ex-vivo snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) model (HAM-2) by assessing its ability to stratify endoscopists by experience (2) evaluate its efficacy in improving tip-control following structured training; and (3) identify baseline predictors of training-related improvement. Methods: In this prospective pilot validation study (single-centre, single-arm, pre/post design), thirteen endoscopists (1 expert, 7 fellows, 5 trainees) performed STSC along 4 standardized 3D-printed shapes on a cooked-ham model. Participants underwent pre-training assessment, two unsupervised structured self-practice sessions (8 shapes), and post-training assessment. Seven blinded raters (three independent raters per video) evaluated video recordings for their subjective impression of tip-control and determined objective metrics (number of correct and incorrect hits) using an online tool. Predictors of improvement were analysed using generalized linear mixed models. Results: 13 endoscopists performed 104 STSC procedures. At baseline, the expert outperformed fellows and trainees in subjective tip-control (95.3 vs. 59.7 vs. 56.3, p<0.001), speed (40.6 vs. 23.6 vs. 19.7 mm/min, p=0.002) and accuracy (98.1% vs. 92.7% vs. 90.6%, p=0.003). Considering the overall cohort subjective tip-control improved by 12.3 (95% CI 6.9–17.7, p<0.001), speed by 5.5mm/min (3.1–7.9, p<0.001), and hit frequency by 6.1hits/min (3.7–8.5, p<0.001) post-training. Accuracy did not improve significantly (+1.3%, p=0.085). Lower endoscopist baseline accuracy and speed independently predicted greater improvement in subjective tip-control. Conclusions: In this single-centre, single-expert pilot, the HAM-2 model stratified endoscopists by experience (exploratory) and, through self-practice on the model, yielded measurable improvements in tip control following repeated practice. HAM-2 offers a low-cost, reproducible platform for structured self-practice and task-specific performance measurement.

Endoscopy International Open
Semmelweis University (HU), Marche Polytechnic University (IT), University of Padua (IT), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE), AZ Delta (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.