Teachers’ views on the use of first-person pronouns in academic writing

Abstract Although there is a growing body of research on first-person pronouns (e.g. I, me, we) in academic prose, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) teachers’ views on their use in academic writing have received little attention. Our study addresses this gap by investigating EAP teachers’ views on the use of first-person pronouns in academic writing, according to discourse functions (e.g. expressing self-benefit, stating a purpose). Data were collected from an online survey and semi-structured interviews. All the interviewees are currently teaching at the tertiary level in the Asia-Pacific region. Our study shows that teachers’ views on the use of first-person pronouns are fairly positive, particularly for low-risk functions (e.g. stating a purpose), but they feel less comfortable using them in high-risk functions (e.g. stating a claim). Our analysis shows that teachers’ views are guided by a consideration for risk-taking and genre. The three most common sources that influenced teachers’ views are published research articles, university writing experience and academic writing textbooks. Our statistical analysis shows that teachers with publication experience tend to have a positive view of pronoun use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08712-9
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Teachers’ views on the use of first-person pronouns in academic writing

Jeremy Koay, Mengzhu Yan
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Teachers’ views on the use of first-person pronouns in academic writing

Jeremy Koay, Mengzhu Yan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although there is a growing body of research on first-person pronouns (e.g. I, me, we) in academic prose, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) teachers’ views on their use in academic writing have received little attention. Our study addresses this gap by investigating EAP teachers’ views on the use of first-person pronouns in academic writing, according to discourse functions (e.g. expressing self-benefit, stating a purpose). Data were collected from an online survey and semi-structured interviews. All the interviewees are currently teaching at the tertiary level in the Asia-Pacific region. Our study shows that teachers’ views on the use of first-person pronouns are fairly positive, particularly for low-risk functions (e.g. stating a purpose), but they feel less comfortable using them in high-risk functions (e.g. stating a claim). Our analysis shows that teachers’ views are guided by a consideration for risk-taking and genre. The three most common sources that influenced teachers’ views are published research articles, university writing experience and academic writing textbooks. Our statistical analysis shows that teachers with publication experience tend to have a positive view of pronoun use.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Teachers’ views on the use of first-person pronouns in academic writing — Jeremy Koay, Mengzhu Yan · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS