Accountable Architecture for Thinking Under Uncertainty

Existing theories of consciousness lack a measurable criterion for accountability: the ability of a system to identify and isolate the source of its own errors. Without this criterion, it is impossible to formalise self-correction or assess cognitive processes. This paper introduces the Rozum Framework (RF), which derives from a single logical foundation: the Open World Theorem, which establishes that no system can achieve a complete and certain description of external reality. From this theorem emerge three consequences – the Existence, Accountability, and Innovation descriptive axioms (strategic imperatives). To describe information processing, the Reliability of Output formula is proposed RO = CI × CS × CA, representing the certainty of input, internal statements, and internal algorithms respectively. The constraint CI ∈ [0,1) is not a modeling assumption but a logical necessity. RF defines consciousness as accountable self-recognition and rozum as consciousness that thinks – a substrate-independent conscious entity enabled by and uses language. The framework identifies an inevitable architectural bias toward false certainty. By revealing the necessary logical connections among existing concepts RF provides the unified, substrate-independent architecture in which accountability and self-correction are measurable functional properties.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22755326
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Education Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Accountable Architecture for Thinking Under Uncertainty

Yaroslav Boichuk
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cognitive Science and Education Research
preprint

Accountable Architecture for Thinking Under Uncertainty

Yaroslav Boichuk
preprint en

Abstract

Existing theories of consciousness lack a measurable criterion for accountability: the ability of a system to identify and isolate the source of its own errors. Without this criterion, it is impossible to formalise self-correction or assess cognitive processes. This paper introduces the Rozum Framework (RF), which derives from a single logical foundation: the Open World Theorem, which establishes that no system can achieve a complete and certain description of external reality. From this theorem emerge three consequences – the Existence, Accountability, and Innovation descriptive axioms (strategic imperatives). To describe information processing, the Reliability of Output formula is proposed RO = CI × CS × CA, representing the certainty of input, internal statements, and internal algorithms respectively. The constraint CI ∈ [0,1) is not a modeling assumption but a logical necessity. RF defines consciousness as accountable self-recognition and rozum as consciousness that thinks – a substrate-independent conscious entity enabled by and uses language. The framework identifies an inevitable architectural bias toward false certainty. By revealing the necessary logical connections among existing concepts RF provides the unified, substrate-independent architecture in which accountability and self-correction are measurable functional properties.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Cognitive Science and Education Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accountable Architecture for Thinking Under Uncertainty — Yaroslav Boichuk · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS