Auxiliary Energy Consumption Characteristics and Prediction Models for Range-Extended Electric Vehicles

Auxiliary energy consumption rises sharply at low temperatures, reducing the accuracy of driving range prediction and vehicle energy management. Most previous studies have focused on battery electric vehicles, whose operating characteristics do not fully represent the powertrain architecture of range-extended electric vehicles (REEVs). This study analyzes REEV auxiliary energy consumption and develops prediction models for operation at low temperatures. Approximately 3600 km of actual road driving data were collected. Auxiliary energy consumption was examined across four dimensions: power mode, trip scale, thermal management load, and range-extender operating share. Engine waste heat reduced auxiliary energy consumption by more than 59% in range-extended mode compared with pure-electric mode. Random Forest (RF), Least-Squares Boosting (LSBoost), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) methods were used to develop a trip-scale auxiliary energy consumption prediction model (trip-scale model) and a second-scale auxiliary energy consumption prediction model (second-scale model). The best test-set R2 was 0.826 for the trip-scale model. For the second-scale model, R2 increased from 0.857 at 30 s to a maximum of 0.872 at 60 s; considering that doubling the sample duration yielded an R2 improvement of only 0.015, the 30 s LSBoost model was selected for subsequent integrated prediction. In the integrated application, the selected model predicted the mean auxiliary power over the remaining trip to estimate the remaining auxiliary energy. Although the departure estimate had a 9.55% error, iterative updates kept the entire estimate close to the measured value, with a maximum absolute residual of 0.022 kWh.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machines
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14091043
Primary Topic
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Auxiliary Energy Consumption Characteristics and Prediction Models for Range-Extended Electric Vehicles

Yu Liu, Hanzhengnan Yu, Hao Zhang, Zhipeng Wang et al.
Machines
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
article

Auxiliary Energy Consumption Characteristics and Prediction Models for Range-Extended Electric Vehicles

Yu Liu, Hanzhengnan Yu, Hao Zhang, Zhipeng Wang, Yongkai Liang, Jingyuan Li, Fengbin Wang
article en

Abstract

Auxiliary energy consumption rises sharply at low temperatures, reducing the accuracy of driving range prediction and vehicle energy management. Most previous studies have focused on battery electric vehicles, whose operating characteristics do not fully represent the powertrain architecture of range-extended electric vehicles (REEVs). This study analyzes REEV auxiliary energy consumption and develops prediction models for operation at low temperatures. Approximately 3600 km of actual road driving data were collected. Auxiliary energy consumption was examined across four dimensions: power mode, trip scale, thermal management load, and range-extender operating share. Engine waste heat reduced auxiliary energy consumption by more than 59% in range-extended mode compared with pure-electric mode. Random Forest (RF), Least-Squares Boosting (LSBoost), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) methods were used to develop a trip-scale auxiliary energy consumption prediction model (trip-scale model) and a second-scale auxiliary energy consumption prediction model (second-scale model). The best test-set R2 was 0.826 for the trip-scale model. For the second-scale model, R2 increased from 0.857 at 30 s to a maximum of 0.872 at 60 s; considering that doubling the sample duration yielded an R2 improvement of only 0.015, the 30 s LSBoost model was selected for subsequent integrated prediction. In the integrated application, the selected model predicted the mean auxiliary power over the remaining trip to estimate the remaining auxiliary energy. Although the departure estimate had a 9.55% error, iterative updates kept the entire estimate close to the measured value, with a maximum absolute residual of 0.022 kWh.

MachinesVol. 14(9)
Hebei University of Technology (CN), China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.