Perceptions, Quality, and Uncertainty in Ghanaian Fertiliser Markets

Fertiliser use among smallholder farmers in Africa is often thought of as a pathway to improved agricultural productivity and reduced poverty. However, farmers’ perceptions of substandard quality of fertiliser may hinder adoption. To examine this, we analyse perceptions of fertiliser quality along the input supply chain in Ghana and also chemically test collected fertiliser samples. We find that agricultural input dealers perceive fertiliser quality to be lower than farmers do, though both estimate the prevalence of substandard fertiliser at much higher rates than what chemical tests find. Local laboratory tests erroneously reported that fertilisers were, on average, well below standard quality. However, an international laboratory found the same samples contained, on average, the labelled quantity of plant nutrients. Many local media outlets report on fake and substandard fertilisers, compounding the already complicated learning environment for farmers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Development Studies
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2026.2727165
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Perceptions, Quality, and Uncertainty in Ghanaian Fertiliser Markets

Andrew M. Simons, Seth Asante, Kwaw Andam
The Journal of Development Studies
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Perceptions, Quality, and Uncertainty in Ghanaian Fertiliser Markets

Andrew M. Simons, Seth Asante, Kwaw Andam
article en

Abstract

Fertiliser use among smallholder farmers in Africa is often thought of as a pathway to improved agricultural productivity and reduced poverty. However, farmers’ perceptions of substandard quality of fertiliser may hinder adoption. To examine this, we analyse perceptions of fertiliser quality along the input supply chain in Ghana and also chemically test collected fertiliser samples. We find that agricultural input dealers perceive fertiliser quality to be lower than farmers do, though both estimate the prevalence of substandard fertiliser at much higher rates than what chemical tests find. Local laboratory tests erroneously reported that fertilisers were, on average, well below standard quality. However, an international laboratory found the same samples contained, on average, the labelled quantity of plant nutrients. Many local media outlets report on fake and substandard fertilisers, compounding the already complicated learning environment for farmers.

The Journal of Development Studies
Fordham University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perceptions, Quality, and Uncertainty in Ghanaian Fertiliser Markets — Andrew M. Simons, Seth Asante, et al. · The Journal of Development Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS