Emerging cannabinoids differ in behavioral safety margins in mice: a comparative hazard proximity analysis of locomotor suppression and catalepsy-like immobility

Abstract Purpose Novel cannabinoids, including tetrahydrocannabihexol (THCH), tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), hexahydrocannabinol (HHC), hexahydrocannabihexol (HHCH), and hexahydrocannabiphorol (HHCP), have raised toxicological concerns, but their acute neurobehavioral effects remain poorly understood. This study compared the in vivo potencies of six cannabinoids using locomotor suppression and catalepsy-like immobility as indices of psychomotor suppression and toxic motor impairment, respectively. Methods Male C57BL/6J mice received intraperitoneal administration of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), HHC, THCH, THCV, HHCH, or HHCP. Catalepsy-like immobility was assessed using the bar test 20 min after dosing (maximum latency, 300 s), and spontaneous locomotor activity was recorded for 10 min beginning 35 min after dosing. ED50 values were determined for locomotor suppression and catalepsy-like immobility, and the Hazard Proximity Index (HPI, %) was calculated as (ED50_locomotor / ED50_catalepsy) × 100, with higher values indicating a narrower behavioral safety margin. Results All cannabinoids reduced spontaneous locomotor activity. THC, THCH, HHCH, and HHCP produced robust catalepsy-like immobility, whereas HHC induced only weak, non-significant immobility. THCV increased immobility only at higher doses and did not reach 50% catalepsy within the tested dose range. HPI values were 25.6% for THC, 45.1% for THCH, 5.1% for HHC, 33.2% for HHCH, and 3.7% for HHCP; HPI was not calculated for THCV. Conclusions Psychomotor suppression occurred at lower doses than catalepsy-like toxicity. Some side-chain-extended cannabinoids, particularly THCH and HHCH, showed a narrower separation between these endpoints. These findings provide comparative ED50 benchmarks and introduce the HPI as a novel ED50-based screening metric for the relative prioritization of emerging cannabinoids in forensic toxicology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Toxicology
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-026-00786-z
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Emerging cannabinoids differ in behavioral safety margins in mice: a comparative hazard proximity analysis of locomotor suppression and catalepsy-like immobility

Manabu Tokeshi, Arisa Ohta, Kyohei Higashi, Kayo Nakamura et al.
Forensic Toxicology
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Emerging cannabinoids differ in behavioral safety margins in mice: a comparative hazard proximity analysis of locomotor suppression and catalepsy-like immobility

Manabu Tokeshi, Arisa Ohta, Kyohei Higashi, Kayo Nakamura, Akihiko Ishida, Akiyoshi Saitoh, Hiroko Abe, Shintaro Shirakura, Hideyo Takahashi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Novel cannabinoids, including tetrahydrocannabihexol (THCH), tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), hexahydrocannabinol (HHC), hexahydrocannabihexol (HHCH), and hexahydrocannabiphorol (HHCP), have raised toxicological concerns, but their acute neurobehavioral effects remain poorly understood. This study compared the in vivo potencies of six cannabinoids using locomotor suppression and catalepsy-like immobility as indices of psychomotor suppression and toxic motor impairment, respectively. Methods Male C57BL/6J mice received intraperitoneal administration of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), HHC, THCH, THCV, HHCH, or HHCP. Catalepsy-like immobility was assessed using the bar test 20 min after dosing (maximum latency, 300 s), and spontaneous locomotor activity was recorded for 10 min beginning 35 min after dosing. ED50 values were determined for locomotor suppression and catalepsy-like immobility, and the Hazard Proximity Index (HPI, %) was calculated as (ED50_locomotor / ED50_catalepsy) × 100, with higher values indicating a narrower behavioral safety margin. Results All cannabinoids reduced spontaneous locomotor activity. THC, THCH, HHCH, and HHCP produced robust catalepsy-like immobility, whereas HHC induced only weak, non-significant immobility. THCV increased immobility only at higher doses and did not reach 50% catalepsy within the tested dose range. HPI values were 25.6% for THC, 45.1% for THCH, 5.1% for HHC, 33.2% for HHCH, and 3.7% for HHCP; HPI was not calculated for THCV. Conclusions Psychomotor suppression occurred at lower doses than catalepsy-like toxicity. Some side-chain-extended cannabinoids, particularly THCH and HHCH, showed a narrower separation between these endpoints. These findings provide comparative ED50 benchmarks and introduce the HPI as a novel ED50-based screening metric for the relative prioritization of emerging cannabinoids in forensic toxicology.

Forensic Toxicology
Tokyo University of Science (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Japan Institute of Wastewater Engineering Technology (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.