Quantifying myocardial repolarization instability using wearable radar-based non-skin-contact estimation of the JT variability index

Background and Aims Myocardial repolarization instability measured by electrocardiography (ECG) as the QT variability index (QTVI) predicts arrhythmic risk. This proof-of-concept study aims to validate a non-skin-contact wearable radar-based technique for monitoring myocardial repolarization instability. Methods QTVI by ECG (normalized QT variability to normalized heart rate variability) was compared to the analogous J-point-to-T-end variability index (JTVI) by ECG. Simultaneous 2-minute ECG and wearable radar recordings acquired under controlled, seated conditions were analysed using an intelligent algorithm to extract mechanical correlates of the J-point and T-end from radar-derived cardiac motion signals, and compared to JTVI by ECG. Results Based on a selection of publicly available datasets of 9 patients with atrial fibrillation, 11 patients with sinus rhythm, and 20 healthy people (n=40, 23% with atrial fibrillation, mean ± SD heart rate 85 ± 12 beats/min, QTVI − 0 . 3 6 ± 0 . 7 5 , JTVI − 0 . 1 0 ± 0 . 7 5 ), the SD of JT and QT intervals strongly agreed ( 𝑅 2 > 0 . 9 9 , bias − 0 . 4 ± 1 . 5 ms, 1 . 1 ± 3 . 9 %), and JTVI and QTVI correlated closely ( 𝑅 2 > 0 . 9 8 , QTVI = 1 . 0 × JTVI − 0 . 2 6 , bias − 0 . 2 6 ± 0 . 1 1 ms). Among a separate group of healthy volunteers (n=20, age 4 3 ± 1 1 years, 25% female, heart rate 6 6 ± 1 4 beats/min, JTVI − 0 . 5 2 ± 0 . 5 1 ), there was excellent agreement for ECG-derived and radar-estimated SD of JT ( 𝑅 2 = 0 . 8 8 , bias 0 . 1 ± 4 . 9 ms, 6 . 4 ± 2 . 7 %), SD of beat-to-beat interval (SDNN) ( 𝑅 2 = 0 . 9 3 , bias 1 6 . 0 ± 2 2 . 1 ms, 9 . 5 ± 4 . 9 %), and JTVI ( 𝑅 2 > 0 . 9 9 , bias 0 . 0 0 ± 0 . 0 5 , 0 . 0 ± 6 . 5 %). Conclusion QTVI and JTVI demonstrate strong agreement with a small systematic bias in quantifying myocardial repolarization instability, and JTVI can be accurately and precisely estimated using radar sensors. This study provides an initial proof-of-concept demonstration of the feasibility of non-skin-contact wearable radar-based monitoring of arrhythmic risk, with particular applicability to culturally sensitive populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2026.111929
Primary Topic
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Quantifying myocardial repolarization instability using wearable radar-based non-skin-contact estimation of the JT variability index

Zainab Riaz, Neil Tom, Martin Ugander, Mark Halaki et al.
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
article

Quantifying myocardial repolarization instability using wearable radar-based non-skin-contact estimation of the JT variability index

Zainab Riaz, Neil Tom, Martin Ugander, Mark Halaki, Tuguy Esgin, Mehmet Yuce, Stephanie Pella
article en

Abstract

Background and Aims Myocardial repolarization instability measured by electrocardiography (ECG) as the QT variability index (QTVI) predicts arrhythmic risk. This proof-of-concept study aims to validate a non-skin-contact wearable radar-based technique for monitoring myocardial repolarization instability. Methods QTVI by ECG (normalized QT variability to normalized heart rate variability) was compared to the analogous J-point-to-T-end variability index (JTVI) by ECG. Simultaneous 2-minute ECG and wearable radar recordings acquired under controlled, seated conditions were analysed using an intelligent algorithm to extract mechanical correlates of the J-point and T-end from radar-derived cardiac motion signals, and compared to JTVI by ECG. Results Based on a selection of publicly available datasets of 9 patients with atrial fibrillation, 11 patients with sinus rhythm, and 20 healthy people (n=40, 23% with atrial fibrillation, mean ± SD heart rate 85 ± 12 beats/min, QTVI − 0 . 3 6 ± 0 . 7 5 , JTVI − 0 . 1 0 ± 0 . 7 5 ), the SD of JT and QT intervals strongly agreed ( 𝑅 2 > 0 . 9 9 , bias − 0 . 4 ± 1 . 5 ms, 1 . 1 ± 3 . 9 %), and JTVI and QTVI correlated closely ( 𝑅 2 > 0 . 9 8 , QTVI = 1 . 0 × JTVI − 0 . 2 6 , bias − 0 . 2 6 ± 0 . 1 1 ms). Among a separate group of healthy volunteers (n=20, age 4 3 ± 1 1 years, 25% female, heart rate 6 6 ± 1 4 beats/min, JTVI − 0 . 5 2 ± 0 . 5 1 ), there was excellent agreement for ECG-derived and radar-estimated SD of JT ( 𝑅 2 = 0 . 8 8 , bias 0 . 1 ± 4 . 9 ms, 6 . 4 ± 2 . 7 %), SD of beat-to-beat interval (SDNN) ( 𝑅 2 = 0 . 9 3 , bias 1 6 . 0 ± 2 2 . 1 ms, 9 . 5 ± 4 . 9 %), and JTVI ( 𝑅 2 > 0 . 9 9 , bias 0 . 0 0 ± 0 . 0 5 , 0 . 0 ± 6 . 5 %). Conclusion QTVI and JTVI demonstrate strong agreement with a small systematic bias in quantifying myocardial repolarization instability, and JTVI can be accurately and precisely estimated using radar sensors. This study provides an initial proof-of-concept demonstration of the feasibility of non-skin-contact wearable radar-based monitoring of arrhythmic risk, with particular applicability to culturally sensitive populations.

Computers in Biology and MedicineVol. 215
The University of Sydney (AU), Curtin University (AU), University of Nusa Cendana (ID), Monash University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.