Lurbinectedin plus irinotecan in pretreated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: results of a phase II expansion cohort

BACKGROUND: D1 and D8 every three weeks combination in multiple solid tumors. Data from the phase II cohort of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are reported in this manuscript. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with NENs (second line or greater) were included, 20 with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), and 14 with grade 2/3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of digestive origin. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v.1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: In patients with NECs, the ORR with lurbinectedin plus irinotecan was 15.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2%-37.9%], the median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI 1.4-5.6 months), and the median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI 2.9-17.8 months). In patients with NETs, the ORR with lurbinectedin plus irinotecan was 7.1% (95% CI 0.2%-33.9%), the median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.4-8.9 months), and the median OS was 16.6 months (95% CI 3.9 months-not reached). The most common treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, 61.8% of patients; diarrhea, 44.1%; and vomiting, 35.3%), fatigue (58.8%), and decreased appetite (20.6%); these events were mostly grades 1 and 2. Grade ≥3 neutropenia was observed in 47.1% of patients and febrile neutropenia in 5.9%. Grade ≥3 transaminase increases were the most common severe laboratory biochemical abnormalities reported during treatment regardless of relationship to study drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lurbinectedin plus irinotecan with primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis showed antitumor activity in GEP-NECs but limited activity in GEP-NETs. This combination had a predictable and manageable safety profile, with myelosuppression, gastrointestinal disorders, and fatigue as main toxicities. The lurbinectedin plus irinotecan combination deserves to be further explored in GEP-NECs after failure of platinum therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108534
Primary Topic
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Lurbinectedin plus irinotecan in pretreated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: results of a phase II expansion cohort

Alejandro Falcón, Javier Molina‐Cerrillo, Rocio García‐Carbonero, Vicente Alfaro et al.
ESMO Open
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
article

Lurbinectedin plus irinotecan in pretreated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: results of a phase II expansion cohort

Alejandro Falcón, Javier Molina‐Cerrillo, Rocio García‐Carbonero, Vicente Alfaro, Teresa Alonso‐Gordoa, Beatriz Antón-Pascual, Gregory M. Coté, P. Zubiaur, J. Jimenez, C. Kahatt, S. Martínez, A. Le Cesne, M. Siguero, A. Gil-Torralvo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: D1 and D8 every three weeks combination in multiple solid tumors. Data from the phase II cohort of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are reported in this manuscript. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with NENs (second line or greater) were included, 20 with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), and 14 with grade 2/3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of digestive origin. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v.1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: In patients with NECs, the ORR with lurbinectedin plus irinotecan was 15.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2%-37.9%], the median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI 1.4-5.6 months), and the median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI 2.9-17.8 months). In patients with NETs, the ORR with lurbinectedin plus irinotecan was 7.1% (95% CI 0.2%-33.9%), the median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.4-8.9 months), and the median OS was 16.6 months (95% CI 3.9 months-not reached). The most common treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, 61.8% of patients; diarrhea, 44.1%; and vomiting, 35.3%), fatigue (58.8%), and decreased appetite (20.6%); these events were mostly grades 1 and 2. Grade ≥3 neutropenia was observed in 47.1% of patients and febrile neutropenia in 5.9%. Grade ≥3 transaminase increases were the most common severe laboratory biochemical abnormalities reported during treatment regardless of relationship to study drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lurbinectedin plus irinotecan with primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis showed antitumor activity in GEP-NECs but limited activity in GEP-NETs. This combination had a predictable and manageable safety profile, with myelosuppression, gastrointestinal disorders, and fatigue as main toxicities. The lurbinectedin plus irinotecan combination deserves to be further explored in GEP-NECs after failure of platinum therapy.

ESMO OpenVol. 11(10)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Instituto Cajal (ES), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (ES), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), PharmaMar (Spain) (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), Mass General Brigham (US)
PharmaMar
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.