Radiographic quality of primary endodontic treatment performed by undergraduate students, general dentists and endodontists: a retrospective cross-sectional study

The quality of primary endodontic treatment may be associated with operator experience and canal instrumentation method. This study evaluated the radiographic quality of root canal fillings and procedural complications in treatments performed by undergraduate students, general dentists, and endodontists. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 698 patients, 753 teeth, and 1206 root canals treated between 2018 and 2024 at a university clinic. Of the canals, 467 were treated by undergraduate students, 475 by general dentists, and 264 by endodontists. Radiographs were assessed for filling length, radiographic homogeneity, and procedural complications. Filling length was analysed using multivariable complex-samples multinomial logistic regression and radiographic homogeneity using a multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation model. Both models adjusted for instrumentation method, tooth group, dental arch, and patient-level clustering. Procedural complications were analysed descriptively. Operator group was associated with filling length ( P = 0.019). Undergraduate students had a higher relative risk of short rather than adequate fillings compared with endodontists (RRR = 3.59, 95% CI: 1.43–8.99; Holm-adjusted P = 0.019) and general dentists (RRR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.11–3.95; Holm-adjusted P = 0.046). Instrumentation method was not independently associated with filling length ( P = 0.617). After adjustment, the odds of radiographic homogeneity were lower for undergraduate students (OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.17–0.62; Holm-adjusted P = 0.001) and general dentists (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16–0.57; Holm-adjusted P = 0.001) than for endodontists. Rotary instrumentation was associated with higher odds of radiographic homogeneity than hand instrumentation (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.03–2.64; P = 0.036). Twenty procedural complications were identified, with no significant association with instrumentation method within any operator group. Within the limitations of this retrospective radiographic study, canals treated by undergraduate students were more likely to be short-filled than those treated by general dentists or endodontists. Radiographic homogeneity was associated with operator group and was more frequent in canals treated by endodontists. Rotary instrumentation was associated with higher radiographic homogeneity but not with filling length.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09897-w
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Radiographic quality of primary endodontic treatment performed by undergraduate students, general dentists and endodontists: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Kinga Kaczor‐Wiankowska, Katarzyna Lewusz‐Butkiewicz, Patrycja Kaźmierczak, Karolina Bruch et al.
BMC Oral Health
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Radiographic quality of primary endodontic treatment performed by undergraduate students, general dentists and endodontists: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Kinga Kaczor‐Wiankowska, Katarzyna Lewusz‐Butkiewicz, Patrycja Kaźmierczak, Karolina Bruch, Aleksandra Michałek, Julia Szudra
article en

Abstract

The quality of primary endodontic treatment may be associated with operator experience and canal instrumentation method. This study evaluated the radiographic quality of root canal fillings and procedural complications in treatments performed by undergraduate students, general dentists, and endodontists. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 698 patients, 753 teeth, and 1206 root canals treated between 2018 and 2024 at a university clinic. Of the canals, 467 were treated by undergraduate students, 475 by general dentists, and 264 by endodontists. Radiographs were assessed for filling length, radiographic homogeneity, and procedural complications. Filling length was analysed using multivariable complex-samples multinomial logistic regression and radiographic homogeneity using a multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation model. Both models adjusted for instrumentation method, tooth group, dental arch, and patient-level clustering. Procedural complications were analysed descriptively. Operator group was associated with filling length ( P = 0.019). Undergraduate students had a higher relative risk of short rather than adequate fillings compared with endodontists (RRR = 3.59, 95% CI: 1.43–8.99; Holm-adjusted P = 0.019) and general dentists (RRR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.11–3.95; Holm-adjusted P = 0.046). Instrumentation method was not independently associated with filling length ( P = 0.617). After adjustment, the odds of radiographic homogeneity were lower for undergraduate students (OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.17–0.62; Holm-adjusted P = 0.001) and general dentists (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16–0.57; Holm-adjusted P = 0.001) than for endodontists. Rotary instrumentation was associated with higher odds of radiographic homogeneity than hand instrumentation (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.03–2.64; P = 0.036). Twenty procedural complications were identified, with no significant association with instrumentation method within any operator group. Within the limitations of this retrospective radiographic study, canals treated by undergraduate students were more likely to be short-filled than those treated by general dentists or endodontists. Radiographic homogeneity was associated with operator group and was more frequent in canals treated by endodontists. Rotary instrumentation was associated with higher radiographic homogeneity but not with filling length.

BMC Oral Health
Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.