Rethinking teachers’ diagnostic skills in AI-supported formative assessment: from diagnosis to meta-diagnosis

This paper explores how integrating AI-supported formative assessment transforms the requirements for teachers’ diagnostic skills in adaptive teaching. AI-supported diagnostic tools broaden the scope of what teachers may attend to: in addition to monitoring and interpreting students’ learning processes, teachers need to consider AI-generated diagnostic inferences when making instructional decisions. Rather than simply increasing the amount of information available for diagnostic judgment, AI-supported assessment introduces a qualitatively different type of diagnostic evidence: AI-generated inferences based on student data. Contrastive case examples illustrate how this shift transforms diagnostic processes into a form of meta-diagnosis, in which teachers evaluate AI-generated inferences in relation to their own diagnostic judgments. Based on these insights, we present a conceptual perspective on teachers’ diagnostic skills in AI-supported settings. We argue that teachers’ diagnostic judgment increasingly involves (a) integrating different types of diagnostic evidence—teachers’ own diagnostic judgments of student learning and AI-generated diagnostic inferences—and (b) monitoring students’ learning processes as they interact with AI systems, adapting instruction accordingly. This conceptualization identifies meta-diagnosis as a key aspect of diagnostic thinking in AI-supported formative assessment. Finally, the paper offers directions for research on teachers’ diagnostic skills and their professional development in AI-supported formative assessment, emphasizing teachers’ continued centrality as pedagogical decision-makers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1857661
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Rethinking teachers’ diagnostic skills in AI-supported formative assessment: from diagnosis to meta-diagnosis

Timo Leuders, Tobias Hoppe, Katharina Loibl
Frontiers in Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Rethinking teachers’ diagnostic skills in AI-supported formative assessment: from diagnosis to meta-diagnosis

Timo Leuders, Tobias Hoppe, Katharina Loibl
article en

Abstract

This paper explores how integrating AI-supported formative assessment transforms the requirements for teachers’ diagnostic skills in adaptive teaching. AI-supported diagnostic tools broaden the scope of what teachers may attend to: in addition to monitoring and interpreting students’ learning processes, teachers need to consider AI-generated diagnostic inferences when making instructional decisions. Rather than simply increasing the amount of information available for diagnostic judgment, AI-supported assessment introduces a qualitatively different type of diagnostic evidence: AI-generated inferences based on student data. Contrastive case examples illustrate how this shift transforms diagnostic processes into a form of meta-diagnosis, in which teachers evaluate AI-generated inferences in relation to their own diagnostic judgments. Based on these insights, we present a conceptual perspective on teachers’ diagnostic skills in AI-supported settings. We argue that teachers’ diagnostic judgment increasingly involves (a) integrating different types of diagnostic evidence—teachers’ own diagnostic judgments of student learning and AI-generated diagnostic inferences—and (b) monitoring students’ learning processes as they interact with AI systems, adapting instruction accordingly. This conceptualization identifies meta-diagnosis as a key aspect of diagnostic thinking in AI-supported formative assessment. Finally, the paper offers directions for research on teachers’ diagnostic skills and their professional development in AI-supported formative assessment, emphasizing teachers’ continued centrality as pedagogical decision-makers.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
University of Education Freiburg (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rethinking teachers’ diagnostic skills in AI-supported formative assessment: from diagnosis to meta-diagnosis — Timo Leuders, Tobias Hoppe, et al. · Frontiers in Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS