Comparative treatment efficiency and water quality index of drinking water systems in North-West Province, South Africa

Access to safe drinking water is a fundamental environmental health requirement, yet integrated assessments of treatment performance and health risks under different land-use pressures remain limited in South Africa. This study evaluated the performance of two drinking water treatment plants in Mahikeng and Klerksdorp, North-West province, representing agricultural and industrial catchments, respectively. A cross-sectional study design was employed. Physicochemical parameters were analysed using the American Public Health Association (APHA) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, while microbiological quality was assessed by membrane filtration to enumerate Escherichia coli and total coliforms. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and results were evaluated against South African National Standards (SANS 241) and World Health Organisation (WHO) drinking water guidelines. Both treatment plants achieved complete microbial removal, without detectable E. coli or total coliforms, indicating effective disinfection. The water quality index (WQI) values classified treated water as moderate in Mahikeng (70–73) and good in Klerksdorp (30–35). However, physicochemical deviations were identified. Mahikeng recorded elevated turbidity (6.64 ± 9.50 NTU), electrical conductivity (183.50 ± 2.12 µS/cm), total hardness (261.94 ± 15.27 mg/L), and residual chlorine (4.14 ± 0.33 mg/L), while Klerksdorp showed an increase in total dissolved solids (491.50 ± 54.45 mg/L) with lower residual chlorine (1.50 ± 0.37 mg/L). These deviations may reduce treatment efficiency, promote microbial regrowth, and affect water acceptability. Although most of the parameters met the SANS 241 and WHO guidelines, the findings reveal system-level vulnerabilities linked to the quality of source water and the optimisation of the treatment. The study highlights the need for integrated, risk-based monitoring frameworks to ensure sustainable drinking water safety under heterogeneous environmental pressures. The Klerksdorp water treatment plant achieved a higher treatment efficiency despite poorer source water quality. The treated water from both plants was largely in accordance with WHO guidelines and SANS 241 drinking water standards. Seasonal variations had limited influence on the overall stability of treated water quality. Persistent turbidity and total hardness exceedances in Mahikeng require process optimisation. Improved source water protection and catchment management are essential for sustainable drinking water quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Water
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-026-00454-8
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative treatment efficiency and water quality index of drinking water systems in North-West Province, South Africa

Lobina Palamuleni, N. Gumbi
Discover Water
Child Nutrition and Water Access
article

Comparative treatment efficiency and water quality index of drinking water systems in North-West Province, South Africa

Lobina Palamuleni, N. Gumbi
article en

Abstract

Access to safe drinking water is a fundamental environmental health requirement, yet integrated assessments of treatment performance and health risks under different land-use pressures remain limited in South Africa. This study evaluated the performance of two drinking water treatment plants in Mahikeng and Klerksdorp, North-West province, representing agricultural and industrial catchments, respectively. A cross-sectional study design was employed. Physicochemical parameters were analysed using the American Public Health Association (APHA) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, while microbiological quality was assessed by membrane filtration to enumerate Escherichia coli and total coliforms. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and results were evaluated against South African National Standards (SANS 241) and World Health Organisation (WHO) drinking water guidelines. Both treatment plants achieved complete microbial removal, without detectable E. coli or total coliforms, indicating effective disinfection. The water quality index (WQI) values classified treated water as moderate in Mahikeng (70–73) and good in Klerksdorp (30–35). However, physicochemical deviations were identified. Mahikeng recorded elevated turbidity (6.64 ± 9.50 NTU), electrical conductivity (183.50 ± 2.12 µS/cm), total hardness (261.94 ± 15.27 mg/L), and residual chlorine (4.14 ± 0.33 mg/L), while Klerksdorp showed an increase in total dissolved solids (491.50 ± 54.45 mg/L) with lower residual chlorine (1.50 ± 0.37 mg/L). These deviations may reduce treatment efficiency, promote microbial regrowth, and affect water acceptability. Although most of the parameters met the SANS 241 and WHO guidelines, the findings reveal system-level vulnerabilities linked to the quality of source water and the optimisation of the treatment. The study highlights the need for integrated, risk-based monitoring frameworks to ensure sustainable drinking water safety under heterogeneous environmental pressures. The Klerksdorp water treatment plant achieved a higher treatment efficiency despite poorer source water quality. The treated water from both plants was largely in accordance with WHO guidelines and SANS 241 drinking water standards. Seasonal variations had limited influence on the overall stability of treated water quality. Persistent turbidity and total hardness exceedances in Mahikeng require process optimisation. Improved source water protection and catchment management are essential for sustainable drinking water quality.

Discover WaterVol. 6(1)
North-West University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.